1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Can this work ?

  1. Feb 3, 2008 #1
    A friend of mine . kind of savant genius ,but this time he has gone too far . hes got this wacko idea . hes all set to try and patent . im trying to help him out by getting some "real" physicists to tell him hes got his head on backward

    heres what he thinks that if someone were to have a wooden box insulated on the outside with rubber . inside this box he will glue a very strong magnet to the bottom of this box . and on the top he will glue /weld a peg he will have a magnet travel up and down on this peg . he believes the repulsing force will force the magnet on top to push up against the box . he believes that a varying magnetic field namely a neodmyium magnet being the base magnet will cause the effect of levitation

    he explained this by saying the upward repulsing force of a neodmyium magnet (say 100 pounds) is stronger than the other magnets 1 or 2 pounds of force as well as the force of gravity .

    he assumes that magnetic fields repulsing is the effect of charged particles trying to push the
    opposite magnetic field out of its field . he also assumes that a more powerful magnetic field will push more on the opposite magnet more than that magnet will push on it
    he explained it like this

    magnet a =100 magnet b = 10 now what happens to 90 pounds of force gotta go somewhere and thats what causes one magnet to be repelled much much more . he intends to use this principle to get the box to levitate

    he also stated this as his equation

    UPMAG > DOWNMAG + Gravity

    where upmag is the upward repelling force of the magnet
    where downmag is the downward repelling force of the magnet
    gravity is well gravity

    could someone give me a full proof answer to this whole problem . i really do believe this friend of mines lost it . im pretty sure some form of a newton laws prohibits this . if it didnt someone would have done this along time .

    i couldnt get the picture to upload so i hope doing this works in explaining

    id appreciate any answer to this

    february 3 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 3, 2008 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    There can only be one force between a pair of objects. They cannot repel each other with different forces.
  4. Feb 3, 2008 #3
    meaning that the larger more powerful magnet wont repel more then the smaller less powerful magnet ?i mean if the pull forces are different wont the more powerful magnet repel much more ?
  5. Feb 3, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    This is analogous to saying that the Earth pulls on a rock more than the rock pulls on the Earth. If this were true, there would be a net force in the rock > Earth direction, meaning this rock would be pushing the Earth around.

    It would mean we could get free rocket propulsion by taking our giant rocket, disposing of the entire rocket-bit, and instead placing a tiny pebble on the stern plate. The rocket's hugely greater mass would pull on the pebble with great force, far outweighting the force that the tiny pebble could pull on the rocket, and poof! our rocket accelerates willy-nilly across the solar system!
  6. Feb 3, 2008 #5
    oh no i think he meant the "repulsing magnetic field" not the earths gravity . we are talking about two magnets with two different pull forces .

    what this savant friend of mine thinks is that the pull of gravity and the downward repulsion of the top magnet is less then say the magnetic pull force or a magnetic field of 100 or 150 pounds from the bottom magnet . gravity doesnt impose that much force does it ? after all flight wouldnt be possible otherwise . this little idea apparently does much less . levitation.

    if all of this is incorrect , i believe it . i just can t put my finger on exactly what law of science and why . knowing how science works is really important to me thats why i ask .

    dave i didnt fully grasp your analogy of the pebble and rocket. i was under the impression that we were referring to magnetic fields not gravity . i mean this pepple doesnt have any magnetic force and even if it did . a shuttle is huge i doubt it could support that much mass

    i got the diagram to upload i hope it shows what i mean

    thanks for answering and your patience with a newbie :)

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 3, 2008
  7. Feb 3, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yes. This is why I called it an analogy. The same principle applies. A rock has a smaller "pull" than Earth.
  8. Feb 3, 2008 #7


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    OK, here's the thing - (for one, it doesn't require special magnets - a magnet and a big piece of steel will give the same results. but let's go with the magnets.)

    The big magnet will - presuming it can lift its own weight - zoom up to hit the top of the box. The impact might cause the box to jerk off the ground... But now that the big magnet is at the top of the box, there are no more net forces except gravity.

    And now the box is at rest on the ground. So where does the levitation come in?

    Personally, I suspect your friend might be toying with you.

    Ask your fiend this question - let's simplify our study of the principles involved by pretending we walked into the room five seconds after the device was set up and set to go but after it does its magnet zooming thing.

    We walk into the room and we see a box (which, fortunately, is transparent). Inside, we see a small magnet glued to the lid, and a larger magnet stuck to it.

    Now, why would it be levitating?
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2008
  9. Feb 3, 2008 #8
    i dont believe him . i just dont know exactly why hes wrong . meaning what law of science governs it. im just playing devils advocate to try and understand how it all works

    secondly the magnet isnt pulling its repulsing with 100 pounds of force .isnt that enough to beat gravity . what my friend says ill see is that maybe a cube about 6 by 6 by 6 inches with a powerful magnet glued to the bottom of a box with its north pole facing upwards . on the lid a small peg has been glued and a magnet with hole will be guided by this peg .its north pole is alligned downwards . because the smaller magnet will push with say 10 pounds of force and the more powerful one pushes with a much greater force at one point the velocity of box maybe 50 or so pounds upward will beat the pull of gravity . now these magnets are constantly applying pressure on each others magnetic field . this constant force will in theory make the net force more going upward then gravities is going downward . i mean you have played with magnets before correct ? well when they repulse they dont stop applying force after the initial contact of the electromagnetic fields .

    your saying that the two magnets are neutral . but are they ? how can a magnet that has 10 x the pulling / repelling force be pushed in the exact same way by a much less powerful magnet . i was under the impression magnetism is the association of materials charges . when repulsing a material is pushing the others magnetic field out of its own . when a material has a much more powerful force that extra force must exert pressure on something that is also a law of nature . i dont understand why the magnets would be neutral . i agree though that if they were then the downward pull of gravity would be much much more powerful then that of the upward force of repulsing magnetism leaving the box on the ground with much to be desired .

    actually this wont work with steel because its repulsing not pulling magnetic force that we are dealing with . the second we magnetize a piece of steel its not just any old piece of steel it would be a magnet .

    many thanks for even bothering to answer this wierd thread :)
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2008
  10. Feb 4, 2008 #9


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Basically, it comes down to the fact that they're both attached to the same object. If there was a magnet below the box, and one inside it or attached to the outside of it, then the box could levitate (think maglev trains). Ask your friend what he thinks would happen if he sealed a rocket inside of the box and lit it.
  11. Feb 4, 2008 #10


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think what you guys are probably missing is that that "pull force" is a advertised rating. It doesn't give that force in all situations.
  12. Feb 4, 2008 #11
    so the advertised rating is not true at all ? i mean ive seen some of these magnets push up almost 100 pounds . they have warning signs on them . r u sure ? and magnets do have pull force ratings dont they ?
    (just remembered . if you ever saw mythbusters they used maybe 3 or 4 of these to scale an air vent )

    im under the impression that this is not a rocket in a box . after all a rocket would just blow the box up now , wouldnt it ?

    i think the whole theory is to harness magnetic fields in a way that we wont need tracks like in the case of maglevs . i totally understand why maglevs work . im just confused how all that electromagnetic energy just goes and does nothing .

    wait did you say attached to the same object ? but they arent . you see its only the peg coming down from the top and the magnet on the bottom thats glued down then somebody had to forcefully guide another magnet onto that peg not it cant go back down it can only go up so it sticks on the top of the box exerting force .

    is there anyway to test this ? i mean cheaply ? ive gotten him to show me the schematics for his so called small scale experiment but large magnets like the ones he wants cost money .alot of money . any ideas ?
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2008
  13. Feb 4, 2008 #12


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Another good analogy would be to imagine yourself inside the box and pushing up on the ceiling with your arms, and your legs pushing down on the floor. Do you think you would actually cause the box to levitate??

    There would be an equal and opposite force (assuming the box walls didn't yield) which would just get you tired and not levitating.

  14. Feb 4, 2008 #13


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Ohhh! I see. They're repelling, not attracting.

    Your friend has selective amnesia when it comes to forces. He's not bothering to consider the fact that, when a magnet in the bottom of a box is pushing away from a magnet in the top of a box, that the magnet in the bottom of the box is pushing downward on the box.

    Question for clarity from your friend: is he claiming sustained levitation, or is he talking momentary levitation, like a fraction of a second?

    This is important. It might be possible to simulate a moment of levitation by taking advantage of the moving elements, inertia and the centre of the mass. i.e. he might get the box to leap off the table an inch or so and take a microscopically longer time to land than expected.
  15. Feb 4, 2008 #14


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Let's just say your "savant genius" friend should make a prototype before he spends thousands of dollars on a patent... because this will not work as an "anti-gravity" machine.
  16. Feb 4, 2008 #15


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It is true under a limited set of conditions. You do understand, for example, that a magnet's force (whether attraction or repulsion is irrelevant) falls off with the square of the distance between the magnet and the object it is acting on, right?

    Also, the rated force is probably for the magnet in contact with ordinary piece of iron or steel. When two magnets are in proximity to each other, the force will be greater than the rating.
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2008
  17. Feb 4, 2008 #16


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    While true, I think this may lead the OP to bark up the wrong tree. Whether accurate or not, the force of the magnets is not the reason this device will fail.

    It will fail because the inventor makes the classic mistake of thinking that a magnet can do work when it is not moving relative to things around it.
  18. Feb 4, 2008 #17
    so he shouldnt even bother testing this ?

    this friend of mine explained this amnesia of force by saying that is compensated by the huge difference of forces between magnets . he showed this in the equation

    upwardmagneticforce > downwardmagneticforce + gravity

    now i dont know whether the pull force is exactly as advertised but one can see how more powerful magnets have larger more powerful fields

    i was under the impression that the energy would be transferred upwards against the top of the box

    but a maglev does work and the magnets on the rail arent moving are they ? well i wouldnt know . he doesnt ignore these things just manages to explain them away .

    and to be noted . it isnt anti gravity . it still uses basic principles and includes gravity in the equation
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2008
  19. Feb 4, 2008 #18
    what it seems like to me after reading everything that is on this one is that your friend isn't acknowledging that there are magnetic fields around the magnets instead of just pulling forces of the magnets. when the magnets are close enough to really affect each other the magnetic fields are what repel each other not the magnets themselves. when the weaker of the magnets gets stopped by the top of the box the magnets will equal out the force in between them so that one magnetic field is larger then the other and the magnetic force between the fields is equal. this will make the upwards and downwards force on the box equal. for example:

    if the magnet on the bottom repels with 100 lbs of pressure (just making the numbers easy here not saying they are correct) and the top magnet repels with 50 lbs of pressure the magnetic fields will equal out their pressure somewhere around 3/4 of the way to the top of the box. then the box will have and equal amount of pressure pushing on it on the top and on the bottom. assuming the box doesn't break the only force that isn't canceled out by an equal force in the opposite direction is gravity. therefore the box wouldn't levitate.

    however i would like to talk to your friend about his idea because in theory someone could use a stationary magnet on the bottom and a magnet that moves up and down on the top and one spinning somewhere on the side to make the box jerk upwards over and over again causing it to stay in the air. but if the magnets are not continuously moving the box will not levitate.
  20. Feb 4, 2008 #19
    Newton's third law tells us that the upward magnetic force is equal to the downward magnetic force. They cancel each other out exactly: all that is left is gravity.
  21. Feb 4, 2008 #20


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    This is what I don't understand though. The powerful magnet stays inside the box. At some point, the magnet is going to be pushing down on the box! How can he think otherwise!!

    But by all means, let him experiment.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook