Can two gyros produce thrust

  • #1
26
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

OK so a trust can produce a torque,
But two torques cant produce a thrust?

There is no way to convert angular momentum into forward momentum.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,457
10,571
There is no way to convert angular momentum into forward momentum.
Correct.
It is symmetric: There is also no way to convert forward momentum to angular momentum.

External forces (like thrusters on a spacecraft) can change both forward and angular momentum at the same time.
 
  • #3
A.T.
Science Advisor
10,480
2,133
OK so a trust can produce a torque,
But two torques cant produce a thrust?
You can have a net force, without a net torque.
You can have a net torque, without a net force.

There is no way to convert angular momentum into forward momentum.
You need a net force, to change linear momentum.
You need a net torque, to change angular momentum.
 
  • #4
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
Google Eric Laithwaite's name and see what happened to a perfectly capable Engineer when he got involved in this topic. The Establishment treated him as a Pariah, despite his being a giant in the field of MagLev. Reactionless drive ranks with Astrology and Homeopathy, unfortunately.
 
  • #5
A.T.
Science Advisor
10,480
2,133
Reactionless drive ranks with Astrology and Homeopathy, unfortunately.
There were some recent efforts by NASA to verify some tiny effects. But that has northing do with Laithwaite's misunderstandings of gyroscopes.
 
  • #6
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,644
5,533
There is no way to convert angular momentum into forward momentum.
Not true. No mysteries here, just ordinary life. The ball throwing machine converts angular to linear. A bullet hitting the tail of the rooster converts linear to angular.

slask.jpeg


il_340x270.624466614_6cok.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Xilus and sophiecentaur
  • #7
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
There were some recent efforts by NASA to verify some tiny effects. But that has northing do with Laithwaite's misunderstandings of gyroscopes.
But there is the same feel about the topic and I am waiting for NASA to say that the effects were due to experimental error. But who knows what the finer effects of GR could produce under extremes of gravity?
 
  • #8
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
Not true. No mysteries here, just ordinary life. The ball throwing machine converts angular to linear. A bullet hitting the tail of the rooster converts linear to angular.

View attachment 114789

il_340x270.624466614_6cok.jpg
Do you happen to have any ball park figures on that experiment?
(But linear and angular momentum are both conserved in both cases.)
 
  • #9
A.T.
Science Advisor
10,480
2,133
The ball throwing machine converts angular to linear. A bullet hitting the tail of the rooster converts linear to angular.
Energy can be transferred between linear KE a angular KE, because it is the same physical quantity.

Linear momentum and angular momentum are different quantities, that aren't converted into each other. Each is conserved on it's own.
 
  • #10
34,457
10,571
Not true. No mysteries here, just ordinary life. The ball throwing machine converts angular to linear. A bullet hitting the tail of the rooster converts linear to angular.

[ATTACH=full]114789[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=full]194353[/ATTACH]
Total linear and total angular momentum are conserved in both cases.
Google Eric Laithwaite's name and see what happened to a perfectly capable Engineer when he got involved in this topic. The Establishment treated him as a Pariah, despite his being a giant in the field of MagLev. Reactionless drive ranks with Astrology and Homeopathy, unfortunately.
And all those are against the forum rules.
 

Attachments

  • #11
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,644
5,533
Total linear and total angular momentum are conserved in both cases.
I stand corrected. Brain not working this morning.
 
  • #12
26
0
Do you guys think atomic physics like the LHC could lead to advanced propulsion?
How could something on the atomic scale relate to propulsion of large scale objects?
 
  • #13
34,457
10,571
The LHC does not do atomic physics. The experiments there do nuclear and particle physics.

Atomic physics is important for ion thrusters, nuclear physics is important for radioisotope power sources and can become important for nuclear reactors in space (only prototypes so far).
 
  • #14
26
0
Slingshoting around a planet leads to acceleration (right?)
If you sling shot around two, would you end up with net acceleration in the same direction?
 
  • #15
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
Slingshoting around a planet leads to acceleration (right?)
If you sling shot around two, would you end up with net acceleration in the same direction?
It works when the first sling shot sends the craft to catch up with the second planet. Each close encounter gives the craft extra momentum - but the detail of the trajectory is fairly critical. The gain in speed will be comparable with the 'forward' speed of the target planet; the orbit round the planet has to be hyperbolic so that the craft is not captured. Google "Slingshot Orbit" Images and see loads of pictures.
 
  • #16
26
0
gravity assist does leave with a net acceleration though right?
I think it imparts momentum on the planet in the opposite direction right?
 
  • #17
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
gravity assist does leave with a net acceleration though right?
I think it imparts momentum on the planet in the opposite direction right?
You mean a net gain in momentum.
Momentum is conserved always.
 
  • #18
34,457
10,571
I think it imparts momentum on the planet in the opposite direction right?
Sure, total momentum is conserved.
Please keep the discussion on topic, or start new threads for different questions.
The gain in speed will be comparable with the 'forward' speed of the target planet
Only in very rare circumstances. You can only gain velocity if the outgoing trajectory is closer to the orbital direction than the incoming trajectory. But every spacecraft motion we can get with current propulsion methods is close to circular orbits. The change in the angle cannot be large, which means the increase in speed cannot be large either, especially for the inner planets.

For the inner planets, you cannot gain their orbital speed even with arbitrary initial motion - their escape velocity is too low.
 
  • #19
643
27
OK so a trust can produce a torque,
But two torques cant produce a thrust?

There is no way to convert angular momentum into forward momentum.
If you stood on a low friction platform which had the ability to rotate and held out an operating giro the platform and yourself would rotate.
You could connect the platform to geared wheels and the whole caboodle would move forward.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Xilus
  • #20
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
For the inner planets, you cannot gain their orbital speed even with arbitrary initial motion - their escape velocity is too low.
I don't understand that bit. Escape velocity refers to getting off the surface, doesn't it? The craft doesn't get that near does it and it is very small in proportion to any of the planet's mass.
 
  • #21
34,457
10,571
I don't understand that bit. Escape velocity refers to getting off the surface, doesn't it? The craft doesn't get that near does it and it is very small in proportion to any of the planet's mass.
Imagine a tiny asteroid. How do you want to use it to change the spacecraft velocity by any significant amount?

The trajectory that changes the speed the most is just grazing the surface of the object, and a larger escape velocity means you can have a larger deflection at higher approach speeds.
 
  • #22
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,800
4,614
Right. It's the gravitational potential that counts, of course.
 

Related Threads on Can two gyros produce thrust

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
Top