How do I transform a second-order PDE with constant coefficients into the canonical form?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I tried to solve this problem:

u_xx + 13u_yy + 14u_zz - 6u_xy + 6u_yz + 2u_xz -u_x +2u_y = 0

I wrote the bilinear form of the second order derivatives and diagonalized it. I found out that it is a hyperbolic equation. Now the problem is how to write it into the canonical form.

What I tried is I wrote it as:

u_aa + u_bb + u_cc + ...(first order derivatives) = 0

where a,b,c are the new variables (in which the matrix is diagonal) and computed the first order derivatives.

Is this a good approach or something else should be done?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Canonical form of PDE

Loading...

Similar Threads - Canonical form | Date |
---|---|

I Quick Differential Form Question | Jun 14, 2017 |

I Question About Exact Differential Form | Jun 13, 2017 |

Canonical Transformation of Parabolic PDEs | Nov 21, 2007 |

Canonical boundary conditions. | Mar 16, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**