Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Canonical form of PDE

  1. May 21, 2007 #1
    How do I transform a second-order PDE with constant coefficients into the canonical form?

    I tried to solve this problem:
    u_xx + 13u_yy + 14u_zz - 6u_xy + 6u_yz + 2u_xz -u_x +2u_y = 0

    I wrote the bilinear form of the second order derivatives and diagonalized it. I found out that it is a hyperbolic equation. Now the problem is how to write it into the canonical form.

    What I tried is I wrote it as:
    u_aa + u_bb + u_cc + ...(first order derivatives) = 0
    where a,b,c are the new variables (in which the matrix is diagonal) and computed the first order derivatives.
    Is this a good approach or something else should be done?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 2, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Do you know how to convert a general conic section equation to its "cononical form"? It's really the same method. Replace the partial derivatives with x, x2, y, y2, etc. and convert that equation. Then change back to the partial derivatives.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Canonical form Date
I Quick Differential Form Question Jun 14, 2017
I Question About Exact Differential Form Jun 13, 2017
Canonical Transformation of Parabolic PDEs Nov 21, 2007
Canonical boundary conditions. Mar 16, 2007