Canonical Quantum Gravity-some history/bibliograph

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date

marcus

Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,713
783
Quantum Gravity--some history/bibliography

The inclusion of matter fields
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9705019
(Thiemann: quantum gravity as regulator of matter fields)
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0212126
(Corichi: fermion conservation invoked to show the Immirzi constant 1/8.088 is consistent with SU(2) symmetry)
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301113
(Perez: divergence-free incorporation of matter, page 4)

Determining the Immirzi parameter
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9710007
(Ashtekar Baez Corichi Krasnov)
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0212126
(Corichi)

Short overview, ideas not formulas
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0202008
(Ashtekar)

Primer
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9910079
(Gaul/Rovelli)

Quantum Cosmology
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0304074 (Ashtekar et al.)

Spin Foam
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301113
(Perez)


History
R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, in Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, edited by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1962).

That same year, 1962, saw the publication of Wheeler's
book "Geometrodynamics".

The Wheeler-De Witt equation also called the "Quantum-Einstein Equation" De Witt's papers are dated around 1967.

Attempts to construct a quantization of the ADM version of General Relativity appear to go back to the Sixties or possibly earlier.


The first attempts quantized the metric and this approach met with a major roadblock which is what motivated Ashtekar to look for new variables. In 1986 Ashtekar reformulated General Relativity in terms of the connection---- "connection-dynamics" as distinct from Wheeler's "geometrodynamics". And loops emerged as the basic functions defined on connections, i.e. the basis for defining quantum states. But it was still the same program----the geometry was embodied by the connection instead of in the metric, and the states by loops, but the goal was the same: quantum geometry.

So after 1986 the configuration space was the space of all possible connections on the manifold and quantum states Ψ
were functions defined on that space---functions of connections.

Rovelli's LivingReviews article gives some of the main dates:


Ashtekar has a good recent overview, Quantum Geometry in Action
arXiv:math-ph/0202008
that describes among other things work by Martin Bojowald
in Quantum Cosmology---applying quantum geometry to the big bang to give a straightforward resolution of the cosmological singularity.

In the unquantized form the curvature goes to infinity as you move back towards "time zero" and
Bojowald constructed the corresponding quantum picture and looked at the curvature operator and discovered that it is bounded----the quantum curvature does not go to infinity. resolves the singularity.

The shortest summary of LQG still seems to be the socalled "primer" written by Rovelli and Upadhya
arXiv:gr-qc/9806079

Thiemann's massive LivingReview article is called
"Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity"
by "modern" he means the loop approach (since 1986) as distinguished from the earlier (1962-1986) metric-based approach
 
Last edited:

marcus

Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,713
783
A passage from Gaul/Rovelli's intro to LQG

towards the end of the preceding post I mentioned Gaul/Rovelli's primer of LQG. It has this interesting description on page 37

"The states |s> are the (3d) diffeomorphism invariant quantum states of the gravitational field. They are labelled by abstract, non-embedded (knotted, colored) graphs s, the s-knots. As we have seen above, each link of the graph can be seen as carrying a
quantum of area. As shown for instance in [34], a similar result holds for the volume: in this case, that are the nodes that carry quanta of volume. Thus, an s-knot can be seen as an elementary quantum excitation of space formed by 'chunks' of space (the nodes) with quantized volume, separated by sheets of surface (corresponding to the links), with quantized area. The key point is that an s-knot does not live on a manifold. The quantized space does [not?] reside 'somewhere'. Instead, it defines the 'where' by itself. This is the picture of quantm space-time that emerges from loop quantum gravity."


Loop Quantum Gravity and the Meaning of
Diffeomorphism Invariance

http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/9910079 [Broken]

It's a good paper because it spells everything out carefully and explicitly. Follows pretty much the same track as Rovelli/Upadhya
with maybe slightly improved notation. The date is December 1999, so it is a year and a half after Rovelli/Upadhya. Treatment is so close to parallel that one can move over more or less painlessly to the later paper. A bit longer: 52 pages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads for: Canonical Quantum Gravity-some history/bibliograph

Replies
1
Views
571
Replies
3
Views
22K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
550
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top