1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Canonical transformation

  1. Dec 17, 2006 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Consider a canonical transformation with generating function

    [tex]F_2 (q,P) = qP + \epsilon G_2 (q,P)[/tex],

    where [tex]\epsilon[/tex] is a small parameter.
    Write down the explicit form of the transformation. Neglecting terms of order [tex]\epsilon^2[/tex] and higher,find a relation between this transformation and Hamilton's equations of motion, by setting [tex]G_2=H[/tex] (why is this allowed?) and [tex]\epsilon = dt[/tex].


    2. The attempt at a solution

    I think the transformation equations are

    [tex]\delta p = P - p = -\epsilon \frac{\partial G_2}{\partial q}[/tex]

    and

    [tex]\delta q =Q-q=\epsilon \frac{\partial G_2}{\partial q}[/tex]


    but how can I solve the last part? Can I just say that with the use of H and dt the equations can be written as

    [tex]\dot{p}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial q}[/tex]

    and

    [tex]\dot{q}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial P}[/tex]

    which are the Hamiltonian equations of motion? And why is this allowed?

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 17, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 17, 2006 #2

    vanesch

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Ooops ! :redface: :redface:

    I'm terribly sorry, instead of replying, I erroneously edited your post ! :bugeye:
     
  4. Dec 17, 2006 #3
    Yes it should be a P, not a q. I get the relations

    [tex]Q = q + \delta q[/tex]

    and

    [tex]P = p + \delta p[/tex]

    but why is it allowed to use G = H?
     
  5. Dec 17, 2006 #4

    vanesch

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You have the choice ! Every function G(q,P) (which is smooth enough) will generate a canonical transformation. So you may just as well use H(q,P), and then - that's the whole point - the transformation equations from (q,p) into (Q,P) give you simply the genuine time evolution where epsilon is the small time step. For an arbitrary G that isn't the case of course, you've just transformed your coordinates (q,p) in some other (Q,P). But for G = H, you've transformed the coordinates (q,p) in what they will be, a small moment later !
    The reason for that is that your transformation equations you've found for an arbitrary G are what they are, and become the Hamilton equations of motion when you pick G to be equal to H.

    Now, strictly speaking we should write H(q,P) instead of H(q,p), but we can replace the P by p here, because they are only a small amount different.
     
  6. Dec 18, 2006 #5
    and it also preserve the fundamental poisson brackets....

    its just a quick calcolus {Q,P}
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Canonical transformation
Loading...