1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Canonical transformations as a category

  1. Mar 28, 2012 #1
    I just realized that given a hamiltonian H, the set generated by its canonical transformations under composition just might be a category.

    Just checking the axioms:
    Given canonical transformations [itex]f:(H,q,p)\rightarrow (K,Q,P)[/itex] and [itex]g:(K,Q,P)\rightarrow (H^\prime, q^\prime,p^\prime)[/itex], [itex]g\circ f[/itex] is also canonical.

    Also, the indentity transformation [itex]\text{id}:(H,q,p)\rightarrow (H,q,p)[/itex] exists and is canonical for any H, and associativity is trivially fulfilled. However, I cannot find any treatment of this category anywhere. It there simply no interest in it or anything to gain from this viewpoint?
     
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted