1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Canonical trasformations

  1. Aug 9, 2014 #1
    I have a system described by the hamiltonian H in the coordinates [itex]i, p_i [/itex]. A transformation of the type
    $Q_i = Q_i(q_i, p_i)$ is called "canonical" if exists a new Hamiltonian, say K(Q,P), and a function F(Q_i,P_i,q_i,p_i) such that is verified

    [itex]p\dot q_i-H=P_i\dot Q_i-K+\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]

    How can i prove that a trasformation is canonical (in this sense) if and only if
    [itex]\{Q_i,P_j\}=\delta_{ij}[/itex]
    when {} are the Poisson's braket?

    I'd wish to understand another thing regardind that. I found a derivation that shows that is sufficient that is been conserved the hamiltonian form of equations of motion to conserve poisson brakets....but we know that the transformations satisfing 1). are not the unique to conserve the hamiltonian form of eq. of motion...so, what is the link between these 2 sets of trasformations?

    SETS 1. Trasformations such that exists K, and F t.c. the eq. 1). is satisfied.
    SETS 2. Trasformations such that exists K satisfing the equation of motion of Hamilton:
    [itex] \dot Q = \frac{\partial K}{\partial P}\\ \dot P = -\frac{\partial K}{\partial Q}[/itex]
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 11, 2014 #2
  4. Aug 13, 2014 #3
    Up up up
     
  5. Aug 14, 2014 #4
    up up up
     
  6. Aug 15, 2014 #5
    up up up up
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Canonical trasformations
Loading...