Momentum and position are canonically conjugate in physics because they are the fourier transforms of each other.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In the context of abstract algebra what would that mean. More precisely, Let G be the group they both (p and x) belong to and let ψ:G->G/H be the natural homomorphism where H is the kernel of ψ. Would p and x be in the same coset in the set of cosets G/H?

Dang, I lost my train of thought and I'm not sure where I'm going with this now. I guess my question now is, please relate canonically conjugate in group theory to Fourier transforms.

Thanks, Nate

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Canonically Conjugate meaning

Loading...

Similar Threads for Canonically Conjugate meaning | Date |
---|---|

I Canonical Quantization | Nov 25, 2017 |

B Canonically conjugate quantities | Apr 22, 2017 |

I Canonically conjugate pairs | Nov 6, 2016 |

Canonically conjugate operators | Dec 17, 2012 |

Heisenberg uncertainty principle derivation and canonically conjugate vairables? | Nov 9, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**