• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Cant simplify?

  • Thread starter trajan22
  • Start date
132
0
the main problem im having is i cant figure out how they simplified this equation. Ill try and use latex but its my first time so i dont know if it will work.
[tex]
\int(1-\frac{1}{3(x+1)}+\frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}) dx
[/tex]
and somehow this simplifies to this
[tex]
x- (1/3)ln(abs(x+1)) +(1/6) \int \frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)} dx - (1/2) \int \frac{(dx)}{(x-.5)^2+(3/4)}
[/tex]
i understand how to get the x-(1/3)ln(2x-1) but i dont get how they seperated the other two terms for integration. or how they pulled out (1/6)
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

2,035
2
Given [tex]
\int\frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}\, dx
[/tex], multiply the numerator and denominator by 2 and rewrite the numerator as (2x-1)-3.
 
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,056
72
Ok, well the third term in the integrand of the original question is [tex]
\frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{(2x-4)}{6(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{(2x-1)}{6(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{3}{6(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{1}{6}\frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{1}{6}\frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(x-\frac{1}{2})^2+\frac{3}{4}} [/tex] where the last step in the denominator of the second term is done by completing the square.
 
132
0
ok i understand what is going on now, but why do we chose to multiply the numerator and denominator by 2, and why do we chose 2 rather than any other number.
 
66
0
ok i understand what is going on now, but why do we chose to multiply the numerator and denominator by 2, and why do we chose 2 rather than any other number.
Multiplying by 2 allows the fraction to be rewritten so that part of it is in the form du/u, which can be integrated to to get ln(abs(u))

-GeoMike-
 
2,035
2
ok i understand what is going on now, but why do we chose to multiply the numerator and denominator by 2, and why do we chose 2 rather than any other number.
Why don't you tell us what you arrive at after using some other number/method? If it's more effective, we'll ditch the earlier one. :smile:

At an glance, you might think that this is solvable by the substitution u = x2- x +1, but once you do it, you'll realise where the 2 comes from.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Cant simplify?

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
909
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
789
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
735
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
525
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Top