1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Cant simplify?

  1. Dec 27, 2006 #1
    the main problem im having is i cant figure out how they simplified this equation. Ill try and use latex but its my first time so i dont know if it will work.
    \int(1-\frac{1}{3(x+1)}+\frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}) dx
    and somehow this simplifies to this
    x- (1/3)ln(abs(x+1)) +(1/6) \int \frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)} dx - (1/2) \int \frac{(dx)}{(x-.5)^2+(3/4)}
    i understand how to get the x-(1/3)ln(2x-1) but i dont get how they seperated the other two terms for integration. or how they pulled out (1/6)
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 27, 2006 #2
    Given [tex]
    \int\frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}\, dx
    [/tex], multiply the numerator and denominator by 2 and rewrite the numerator as (2x-1)-3.
  4. Dec 27, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Ok, well the third term in the integrand of the original question is [tex]
    \frac{(x-2)}{3(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{(2x-4)}{6(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{(2x-1)}{6(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{3}{6(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{1}{6}\frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(x^2-x+1)}=\frac{1}{6}\frac{(2x-1)}{(x^2-x+1)}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(x-\frac{1}{2})^2+\frac{3}{4}} [/tex] where the last step in the denominator of the second term is done by completing the square.
  5. Dec 27, 2006 #4
    ok i understand what is going on now, but why do we chose to multiply the numerator and denominator by 2, and why do we chose 2 rather than any other number.
  6. Dec 27, 2006 #5
    Multiplying by 2 allows the fraction to be rewritten so that part of it is in the form du/u, which can be integrated to to get ln(abs(u))

  7. Dec 28, 2006 #6
    Why don't you tell us what you arrive at after using some other number/method? If it's more effective, we'll ditch the earlier one. :smile:

    At an glance, you might think that this is solvable by the substitution u = x2- x +1, but once you do it, you'll realise where the 2 comes from.
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2006
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Cant simplify?
  1. Simplify the expression (Replies: 10)

  2. Cannot simplify (Replies: 4)

  3. Simplifying logaritm (Replies: 2)

  4. Simplifying a cubic (Replies: 5)