- #1
SUDOnym
- 90
- 1
All reversible cyclic processes (engines) have the same efficiency: 1-T2/T1.
And Carnot demostrated this efficiency with the Carnot Cycle and went on to use this to demonstrate that this was the upper limit for efficiency.
My question is, why is it that there is such importance placed on the Carnot Cycle? ie. since all reversible processes have this same efficiency couldn't we say just take an engine whos path is:
a isobaric b isochoric c isobaric d isochoric a isobaric b isochoric c isobaric d isochoric ...and so on.
and use this engine to also demonstrate that the upper limit is 1-T2/T1? is it simply that with the carnot cycle, which is:
a isotherm b adiabat c isotherm d adiabat a isotherm b adiabat c isotherm d adiabat ... and so on
makes it easy to demonstrate this result?
And Carnot demostrated this efficiency with the Carnot Cycle and went on to use this to demonstrate that this was the upper limit for efficiency.
My question is, why is it that there is such importance placed on the Carnot Cycle? ie. since all reversible processes have this same efficiency couldn't we say just take an engine whos path is:
a isobaric b isochoric c isobaric d isochoric a isobaric b isochoric c isobaric d isochoric ...and so on.
and use this engine to also demonstrate that the upper limit is 1-T2/T1? is it simply that with the carnot cycle, which is:
a isotherm b adiabat c isotherm d adiabat a isotherm b adiabat c isotherm d adiabat ... and so on
makes it easy to demonstrate this result?