Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Carnot Engine Efficiency

  1. Oct 28, 2012 #1
    Hello,

    I am having difficulty understanding the paragraph in my textbook explaining why no other engine can be more efficient than a carnot engine. What does it mean?

    To prove the validity of this theorem, imagine two heat engines operating
    between the same energy reservoirs. One is a Carnot engine with efficiency eC, and
    the other is an engine with efficiency e, where we assume e > eC. Because the cycle
    in the Carnot engine is reversible, the engine can operate in reverse as a refrigerator.
    The more efficient engine is used to drive the Carnot engine as a Carnot refrigerator.
    The output by work of the more efficient engine is matched to the input by
    work of the Carnot refrigerator. For the combination of the engine and refrigerator,
    no exchange by work with the surroundings occurs. Because we have assumed the
    engine is more efficient than the refrigerator, the net result of the combination is
    a transfer of energy from the cold to the hot reservoir without work being done on
    the combination. According to the Clausius statement of the second law, this process
    is impossible. Hence, the assumption that e > eC must be false.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 29, 2012 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    It means that no engine can be more efficient than a Carnot engine. Such a machine could be used to reduce entropy (move energy from cold to hot reservoir), as shown in the text.
     
  4. Oct 29, 2012 #3

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That paragraph assumes in advance that the Clausius statement of the second law is valid, i.e. it is impossible to transfer energy from a cold reservoir to a hot one without an input of work. It then uses the method of contradiction to prove that no heat engine can have an efficiency greater than that of a Carnot engine. That is, we imagine that such an engine exists, and show that it would allow us to violate the Clausius statement.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook