Casey Anthony Not Guilty!

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
174
Wow, I thought she was gonna hang for sure!
 

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
What about the duct tape? Is there any reason that a dead child (presumed drowning victim) should have duct-tape on her face? I have a problem with the jury in this one. This verdict does not pass the straight-face test for me. Someone killed that toddler IMO and someone covered it up.
 

Char. Limit

Gold Member
1,198
12
Who is Casey Anthony and why should I care?
 
1,028
2
Oh great. There is going to be a circus in my state.
 

dlgoff

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,724
1,618
I was hoping that after the verdict, I'd quit hearing about it all the time. Guess I was wrong. :(
 
542
44
What about the duct tape? Is there any reason that a dead child (presumed drowning victim) should have duct-tape on her face? I have a problem with the jury in this one. This verdict does not pass the straight-face test for me. Someone killed that toddler IMO and someone covered it up.
Someone definitely killed her. No reason to put duct tape on the face of a child that's already dead.
 
They were discussing it on the radio earlier. Basically the evidence was all circumstantial and the defense seems to have been able to spin that into reasonable doubt, at least in the minds of the jurors. There's no question that some crime was commit, just whether or not it was her.
 
Someone definitely killed her. No reason to put duct tape on the face of a child that's already dead.
A common theory is that it was an accident and they disposed of the body in such a fashion hoping to take the heat of themselves and make it look like some sort of kidnapping.
 
107
0
They were discussing it on the radio earlier. Basically the evidence was all circumstantial and the defense seems to have been able to spin that into reasonable doubt, at least in the minds of the jurors. There's no question that some crime was commit, just whether or not it was her.
Reasonable doubt of who killed the child and when - maybe? But, it took 30 days for her to report the child missing, in the interim there is proof she was out partying, the mother called the police and said her car smelled like death, then the child is found in a swamp with duct tape about her mouth and head - (given this evidence) all the jury convicted her of was telling lies to the police - shame on the prosecution (again) - IMO.
 

BobG

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
110
80
Reasonable doubt of who killed the child and when - maybe? But, it took 30 days for her to report the child missing, in the interim there is proof she was out partying, the mother called the police and said her car smelled like death, then the child is found in a swamp with duct tape about her mouth and head - (given this evidence) all the jury convicted her of was telling lies to the police - shame on the prosecution (again) - IMO.
Taking a month to let anyone know the child was missing is the most damning 'evidence' that was presented. That just didn't make sense.

But, there was just about no actual physical evidence. There wasn't enough physical evidence to prove the cause of death, let alone who did it.

Common sense tells you she knew the child was dead, how the child died, and was involved somehow, but everything else is just speculation (as is the idea that Casey knew Caylee was dead, to be honest, but come on). And the lack of evidence provides a pretty good reason for hiding the fact the child was dead for as long as possible - the older the evidence, the better the chance it would have disappeared.

I think it's hard to prove a case when you don't have physical evidence.

(By the way - have you considered just adding "IMO" to your signature line. :rofl:)
 
854
16
She never said that she would spend the rest of her life looking for the real killer. That's pretty suspicious to me.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,867
2,343
It's just a travesty. Definitely one of those times that justice was not served.
 
848
4
Not surprised by the result, and I don't blame the jury at all. There are hundreds of cases every year where someone gets away with murder because of unsubstantial evidence. Our justice system is based on the idea that it is better to let a true criminal go free than to convict an innocent person. Even though justice was not served, the jury did as it was supposed to.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,867
2,343
Not surprised by the result, and I don't blame the jury at all. There are hundreds of cases every year where someone gets away with murder because of unsubstantial evidence. Our justice system is based on the idea that it is better to let a true criminal go free than to convict an innocent person.
Having followed the trial, I do blame the jury, there was enough to convict, IMO.

What mother doesn't go nuts if their child that age is missing for even an hour? I'd go nuts after 10 minutes.
 
2,080
79
She never said that she would spend the rest of her life looking for the real killer. That's pretty suspicious to me.
Definitely. Now OJ has dedicated himself to doing just that for the two people he didn't kill. Right now he's following up at a Nevada prison which he cleverly got himself into. The real killer is no doubt in there somewhere.
 
Last edited:
107
0
(By the way - have you considered just adding "IMO" to your signature line. :rofl:)
It keeps me out of the penalty box.
 
848
4
Having followed the trial, I do blame the jury, there was enough to convict, IMO.

What mother doesn't go nuts if their child that age is missing for even an hour?
I didn't follow that closely, I just had heard that the evidence was underwhelming. Could you perhaps give us some info on what evidence was presented? I would appreciate hearing it from you more than a news website.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,867
2,343
I didn't follow that closely, I just had heard that the evidence was underwhelming. Could you perhaps give us some info on what evidence was presented? I would appreciate hearing it from you more than a news website.
No, it would be better to list the actual evidence. I'd add bias as a mother. The evidence was rather overwhelming, especially the testimony from her father and his suicide note. She didn't report her daughter as missing. After her daughter was dead and no one knew it, she was out partying.

If she wasn't solely responsible for her daughters death, she was part of it and the coverup. That alone would put her behind bars for years.
 
1,675
3
People get convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence all the time. You don't even need to have the corpse to do it.

I have lost all faith in our present jury system. We either need professional jurors or we need to lower the standards of evidence to prove guilt.

I would rather send 10 innocent people to jail in order convict just one Casey Anthony. There will be more dead children at the hands of sociopaths like her who make the calculation that they'll only get a few years and no chair if they're caught.

I repeat; the jury system does not work and should be replaced by a jury of "engineers"; analytical, educated, well-paid professional jurors who rule based on common sense.

If I were the sole juror she'd be heading for the electric chair. Why? Because any fool can see she's a pathological liar and sociopath and that she deliberately killed her child. Any other conclusion flies in the face of all reason.
 
848
4
I would rather send 10 innocent people to jail in order convict just one Casey Anthony.
I think you are hyperbolizing, but if not, that's pretty awful.
 

morrobay

Gold Member
682
93
What happened here is that saps, like the jurors in the o.j. simpson trial,
are not just in L.A.

And outside of that one in ten comment , I completely agree with Antiphon.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,867
2,343
A juror was just on tv and said that they voted not guilty because there was no definite cause of death given, not that she wasn't guilty of murder.

WHAT?????
 
107
0
A juror was just on tv and said that they voted not guilty because there was no definite cause of death given, not that she wasn't guilty of murder.

WHAT?????
Did they ever prove when the baby died, how the baby died, where the baby died, who was present when the baby died, who knew the baby died, who put duct tape and bags on the baby, who put the baby in the car, when duct tape was placed on the baby, when the baby was taken to the swamp, who transported the baby to the swamp, who placed the baby in the swamp, who cleaned the car, and who had a real motive?

Too many unknowns - coupled with evidence that was not peer-reviewed - the prosecution dropped the ball.
 
1,675
3
I think you are hyperbolizing, but if not, that's pretty awful.
I do not hyperbolize this one. It's awful. But thats what these incompetent juries have done to me.

Edit: the inexorable logic is this: juries are failing. Killers must be kept off the street. Therefore I will accept a larger error rate to keep them off the street.

Maybe Casey Anthony will get a job in a nursing home tending your loved ones.

No thanks.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Casey Anthony Not Guilty!

Replies
2
Views
230
  • Posted
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
297
Replies
81
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top