1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Casimir's trick, with a stupid question

  1. Mar 23, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    There's a similar discussion on the forum at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=162812, but I'm not sure it's correct, and it doesn't entirely apply to my problem.

    From QED/QFT, we use Casimir's trick when calculating the S-matrix to find
    [tex] \sum_{s=1}^2u^{(s)}_{ \alpha}( \mathbf{p}) \bar u^{(s)}_{ \beta}( \mathbf{p}) = \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \alpha \beta} [/tex]
    [tex]\begin{multline} \frac{1}{2} \sum_s \sum_{s'} \lvert \bar u' \gamma_4 u \lvert^2= \frac{1}{2} \sum_s \sum_{s'} \bar u^{(s)}_{ \delta}( \mathbf{p}) ( \gamma_4)_{ \delta \gamma} u^{(s')}_{ \gamma}( \mathbf{p}') \bar u^{(s')}_{ \beta}( \mathbf{p}') ( \gamma_4)_{ \beta \alpha} u^{(s)}_{ \alpha}( \mathbf{p})
    \\~ = \frac{1}{2}( \gamma_4)_{ \delta \gamma} \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \gamma \beta}( \gamma_4)_{ \beta \alpha} \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \alpha \delta}= \frac{1}{2} \text{Tr} \bigg[ \gamma_4 \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p' +m}{2m} \bigg) \gamma_4 \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p -m}{2m} \bigg) \bigg]\end{multline}[/tex]

    I'm using old notation, so in most modern texts you would probably do something more aligned with Griffiths, http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CasimirTrick.html.

    My problem involves a slight variation, and I'm not sure how to deal with it. Instead of
    [tex] \lvert \bar u' \gamma_4 u \lvert , [/tex]
    I've reached a point where I'm stuck with
    [tex] \lvert \bar u' u \lvert [/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution
    Well, I still have
    [tex] \sum_{s=1}^2u^{(s)}_{ \alpha}( \mathbf{p}) \bar u^{(s)}_{ \beta}( \mathbf{p}) = \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \alpha \beta} [/tex]
    But my sticking point is
    [tex] \frac{1}{2} \sum_s \sum_{s'} \lvert \bar u' u \lvert^2= \frac{1}{2} \sum_s \sum_{s'} \bar u^{(s)}_{ \delta}( \mathbf{p}) u^{(s')}_{ \gamma}( \mathbf{p}') \bar u^{(s')}_{ \beta}( \mathbf{p}') u^{(s)}_{ \alpha}( \mathbf{p})= \frac{1}{2} \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \gamma \beta} \bigg( \frac{-i \gamma \cdot p+m}{2m} \bigg)_{ \alpha \delta}[/tex]

    The sad thing is that I think my situation is actually easier to deal with. Any insight would be appreciated.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2012
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Casimir's trick, with a stupid question
Loading...