I know that if the series of (a)n (n is a subscript) converges, then the lim (a)n=0. How can I show that if the series of (a)n converges, then lim n(a)n=0?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Or rather if a1 +a2 +a3 +...+an=0, then lim n*(a)n=0?

Not sure how to show this, but I know the proof involves the cauchy criterion for series. Help anyone?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cauchy Criterion for Series

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cauchy Criterion Series | Date |
---|---|

I Cauchy Principal Value | Mar 23, 2017 |

I Cauchy Reimann Condition | Aug 22, 2016 |

I Cauchy's Integral Test for Convergence | Jun 20, 2016 |

I Cauchy Repeated Integration Explanation? | Mar 11, 2016 |

Cauchy Criterion for Series limit | Dec 11, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**