My book says that the Cauchy-Hadamar theorem reads: Consider a power serie [itex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n[/itex]. The radius of convergence is given by(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]r = \frac{1}{\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |a_n|^{1/n}}[/tex]

But on mathworld, it is enounced as follow (notice that it's the UPPER limit).

Which is considerably different, because for the serie

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{2n}}{5^n}[/tex]

for exemple, which can be rewritten as a power serie of the form

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n x^n[/tex]

where a_n = 0 if n is even and a_n = 5^(-n/2) if n is odd, we have that [itex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |a_n|^{1/n}[/itex] does not exist because the subsequence a_n where n is even converges towards 0 and the subsequence a_n where n is odd converges towards 5^(-1/2). So the limit doesn't exist.

On the other hand, the upper limit of the sequence |a_n|^{1/n} is obviously 5^(-1/2) since |a_n| is decreasing.

So the two theorems are not equivalent. :grumpy:

Who's right?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cauchy-Hadamard theorem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**