Lets say we have: [tex] (a_{1}b_{1} + a_{2}b_{2} + ... + a_{n}b_{n})^{2} \leq (a_{1}^{2} + a_{2}^{2} + ... + a_{n}^{2})(b_{1}^{2} + b_{2}^{2} + ... + b_{n}^{2}) [/tex]. Let [tex] A = a_{1}^{2} + a_{2}^{2} + ... + a_{n}^{2} , B = a_{1}b_{1} + a_{2}b_{2} + ... + a_{n}b_{n}, C = b_{1}^{2} + b_{2}^{2} + ... + b_{n}^{2} [/tex]. Thus we have [tex] AC \geq B^{2} [/tex]. From [tex] 0\leq (a_{1} + tb_{1})^{2} + (a_{2} + tb_{2})^{2} + ... + (a_{n} + tb_{n})^{2} [/tex] where [tex] t [/tex] is any real number, we obtain [tex] 0 \leq A + 2Bt + Ct^{2} [/tex]. Completing the square, we obtain [tex] Ct^{2} + 2Bt + A = C(t + \frac{B}{C})^{2} + (A - \frac{B^{2}}{C}) [/tex]. From this step, how do we obtain [tex] 0 \leq A - \frac{2B^{2}}{C} + \frac{B^{2}}{C} = \frac{AC-B^{2}}{C} [/tex], implying that [tex] AC - B^{2} \geq 0 [/tex]? Thanks
you need to show that for the minimal value of t the inequality still holds. from algebra we know that for C>=0 t=-B/C.
Hi courtrigrad, Why complete the square? The graph of [itex] Ct^2 + 2Bt + A[/itex] is that of a porabola opening upwards. Since this quadratic equation is greater than or equal to zero for all values of t there can either be a single root of multiplicity 2, or none at all. What does this tell you about the discriminant of the equation?
yeah, but I am referring this out of Courant's book. Just trying to see how he approached it. [tex] B^{2} - 4AC \leq 0 [/tex] Thanks
Probably a typographical error, but the discriminant should be 4B^2 - 4AC. Perhaps Courant is implying you plug in the value t = -B/C, in which case you would get [tex]A - \frac{B^2}{C} \geq 0 [/tex] or if you plug it into the original quadratic you would get the equvalent [tex]0 \leq A - \frac{-2B^2}{C} + \frac{B^2}{C} [/tex] as he did. He probably completes the square to motivate this choice of t.