This is what it is in my book, i dont know how it went from saying that the difference is 2e and then using e/2 . The part that confuses me , is why the book outlines (1) to then use it in the proof, it looks that (1) doesnt even matter because since e > 0 then e/2 will do just fine.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(1) Suppose { a_n } converges to A. Choose e > 0, THere is a positive integer N such that, if

n, m >= N , then A - e < a_n < A + e and A - e < a_m < A + e

Thus for all n, m >= N we find a_n ∈ ( A - e , A + e ) and

a_m ∈ ( A - e , A +e ) . the set ( A - e, A +e ) is an interval of length 2e ,

hence the difference between a_n, and a_m is less then 2e

we will now state a theorem , the proof of which we have just outlined

THEOREM :Every convergent sequence is a cauchy sequence

Proof: Suppose {a_n} converges to A, choose e > 0 , then e/2 > 0

there is a positive integer N such that n>=N implies abs[a_n - A ] < e/2

by (1) the difference between a_n , a_m was less than twice the original choice of e

Now if m , n >= N , then abs[a_n - A ] < e/2 and abs[a_m - A] < e/2 , hence

abs[a_n - a_m ] = abs[ a_n - A + A - a_m ] <= abs[a_n - A ] + abs[ A - a_m ]

= abs[a_n - A ] + abs[ a_m - A ] < e/2 + e/2 = e

thus {a_n} is cauchy

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cauchy Sequence Problem Update

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**