i met a proof to cayley hamilton theorem and have some questions.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It uses that lambda*I - A is invertible. But lambda is surely an eigenvalue of A and 1/(lamda*I - A) is not legit so how is it legal to use that.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cayley - hamilton theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cayley hamilton theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Third Invariant expressed with Cayley-Hamilton Theorem | Apr 11, 2016 |

Using Cayley-Hamilton Theorem to Calculate Matrix Powers | Feb 13, 2013 |

Cayley Hamilton Theorem | Apr 1, 2011 |

Prooving the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem | Jun 4, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**