If A is an n by n matrix of constants from the commutative ring k, and I is the identity n by n matrix, then Lagrange's expansion formula for determinants implies that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

adj[XI-A].[XI-A] = f(X).I where f(X) is the characteristic polynomial of A, and adj denotes the classical adjoint whose entries are + or - the (n-1) by (n-1) minors of A.

Since setting X=A makes the left side equal to zero, we also have f(A) = 0. QED for cayley hamilton. (i.e. any square matrix A satisfies its own characteristic polynomial f(X) = det[XI-A].)

Q: is this a correct argument?

[hint: how could anything so simple and natural not be correct?]

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cayley hamilton

Loading...

Similar Threads for Cayley hamilton | Date |
---|---|

I Third Invariant expressed with Cayley-Hamilton Theorem | Apr 11, 2016 |

Using Cayley-Hamilton Theorem to Calculate Matrix Powers | Feb 13, 2013 |

Cayley Hamilton Theorem | Apr 1, 2011 |

Prooving the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem | Jun 4, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**