If the Cayley table, of a finite set G, is a latin square (that is, any element g appears once and only once in a given row or column) does it follow G is a group?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know the converse is true, and it seems reasonable that this is true. Since the array will be of size |G|x|G|, inverses exist and are unique. There will be one row (and one column) that will represent the multiplication by the identity (since the rows and columns are permutations of the set). But I don't know about associativity; in fact I'm not even sure the if the column and row representing the identity will actually be the same element. So is there a counter-example or if it's true, a proof?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cayley Table and Groups

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cayley Table Groups | Date |
---|---|

I Third Invariant expressed with Cayley-Hamilton Theorem | Apr 11, 2016 |

Cayley table of a group | Apr 23, 2014 |

Does Cayley's Theorem imply all groups are countable? | Jan 4, 2014 |

Using Cayley-Hamilton Theorem to Calculate Matrix Powers | Feb 13, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**