Is w1/w2 = √r2/r1 the Correct Derivation for Circular Central Force?

In summary, the conversation discusses the derivation of the equation w1/w2=√r2/r1, which is used to determine the angular velocity of two objects spinning on a plate. The equation is derived using the physical reasoning that the angular velocity must meet a certain condition for an object to stay on the plate or fall off. The conversation also covers algebraic mistakes and how to correctly simplify the equation. The final conclusion is that the equation is correct and can be used to calculate the angular velocity of the objects.
  • #1
SwedishFred
28
0
Member warned about posting without the template and with no effort
Hi
we are going through cirkular centralforce and I am complete stuck...
I can't find the derivation to why w1/w2=√r2/r1 is correct
w1/w2=√r2/r1sorry I am lost...
best regards
Fred
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SwedishFred said:
Hi
we are going through cirkular centralforce and I am complete stuck...
I can't find the derivation to why w1/w2=√r2/r1 is correct
w1/w2=√r2/r1sorry I am lost...
best regards
Fred

Maybe you could explain what those symbols mean?
 
  • #3
yes of course , sorry
There are two objects that are spinning on a plate and they fall off, and the physical reasoning is that the angular velocity (ω) has to meet the condition
ω1/ω2=√r2/r1

ω1= angular velocity objekt 1
ω2= angular velocity objekt 2
r2= objet 2 position to the center of the plate
r1= objet 1 position to the center of the plate

Best regards
 
  • #4
SwedishFred said:
yes of course , sorry
There are two objects that are spinning on a plate and they fall off, and the physical reasoning is that the angular velocity (ω) has to meet the condition
ω1/ω2=√r2/r1

ω1= angular velocity objekt 1
ω2= angular velocity objekt 2
r2= objet 2 position to the center of the plate
r1= objet 1 position to the center of the plate

Best regards

You should probably the objects will fall of when the acceleration exceeds that which can be produced by the frictional force holding them on. Do you know that the acceleration is given by the expression ##v^2/r## where ##r## is distance from the center and ##v## is rotational speed? What's the relation between ##v## and angular velocity?
 
  • #5
I Think that the relation is V=ωr correct? (and the friktionskoefficient is the same for both the objects)
 
  • #6
That is correct. Now we need an equation to express 'staying on the plate' versus 'flying off' a bit more in physics terms using the variables in our exercise.
The template had an item for that; unfortunately it has disappeared (how ?, strange !). So here is a copy:

Homework Statement



Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

 
  • #7

Homework Statement



There are two objects that are spinning on a plate and they fall off, and the physical reasoning is that the angular velocity (ω) has to meet the condition
ω1/ω2=√r2/r1

ω1= angular velocity objekt 1
ω2= angular velocity objekt 2
r2= objet 2 position to the center of the plate
r1= objet 1 position to the center of the plate

Homework Equations


ω1/ω2=√r2/r1
V=ωr

The Attempt at a Solution



√r2/r1 * ω1/ω2=0

√((ω1r2)/(ω2r1))=0

hmm this doenst feel right..
 
  • #8
SwedishFred said:

Homework Statement



There are two objects that are spinning on a plate and they fall off, and the physical reasoning is that the angular velocity (ω) has to meet the condition
ω1/ω2=√r2/r1

ω1= angular velocity objekt 1
ω2= angular velocity objekt 2
r2= objet 2 position to the center of the plate
r1= objet 1 position to the center of the plate

Homework Equations


ω1/ω2=√r2/r1
V=ωr

The Attempt at a Solution



√r2/r1 * ω1/ω2=0

√((ω1r2)/(ω2r1))=0

hmm this doenst feel right..

You haven't really done anything except for make an algebra mistake. Start from the physics. What condition will make an object fall off the plate?
 
  • #9

Homework Statement


[/B]
Object 1 lies on a spinning plate at a distance ##r_1## from the axis. It flies off at angular speed ##\omega_1## (at lower speeed it is held in orbit by friction)
Object 2 lies on the same plate at a distance ##r_2## from the axis. It flies off at angular speed ##\omega_2##.
Friction coefficients are the same for both objects.
Masses of objects may or may not be the same.

Show that ##\omega_1/\omega_2=\sqrt{r_2/r_1}##


Homework Equations



Friction force required to stay in circular orbit F = ...
Maximum centripetal acceleration friction force can provide aat fly-off speed =


The Attempt at a Solution



...
 
  • #10

Homework Equations



Friction force required to stay in circular orbit F = m·v2/r
Maximum centripetal acceleration friction force can provide a at fly-off speed ac =v2/r

on the right track?
 
  • #11
SwedishFred said:

Homework Equations



Friction force required to stay in circular orbit F = m·v2/r
Maximum centripetal acceleration friction force can provide a at fly-off speed ac =v2/r

on the right track?

Right track. Now replace the ##v## with an expression involving angular velocity.
 
  • #12

The Attempt at a Solution


F = m·v2/r = (m* (ωr)2)/r
ac =v2/r =(ωr)2/r
 
  • #13
SwedishFred said:

The Attempt at a Solution


F = m·v2/r = (m* (ωr)2)/r
ac =v2/r =(ωr)2/r

Ok, now simplify that expression. ##a_c## doesn't depend on the mass, agree? So for any two objects ##a_c## is the same.
 
  • #14
agree
(ωr)2/r = 2ω3r2
 
  • #15
SwedishFred said:
agree
(ωr)2/r = 2ω3r2

I don't recognize the algebra you did you get that. Can you explain?
 
  • #16
Ohh sorry calculation fault
I don't know the name in English (kvadreringsregler) (a+b)2 = a2+2ab+b2

this one is wrong! se next one..
 
Last edited:
  • #17
or the potens rule axbx=(ab)x
 
  • #18

The Attempt at a Solution



I am overseeing the weight i F.
ω²r=ω²r
ω²/ω²=r/r
ω/ω=√r/r

am I right ??
[/B]
 
  • #19
SwedishFred said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I am overseeing the weight i F.
ω²r=ω²r
ω²/ω²=r/r
ω/ω=√r/r

am I right ??[/B]

Right idea. It would look much better if you'd distinguish the two values of ##\omega## and ##r##. Start from ##\omega_1^2 r_1 = \omega_2^2 r_2##.
 
  • #20

The Attempt at a Solution



ω21r122r2
ω2122=r2/r1
2122)=(r2/r1)
ω12=(r2/r1)

I Think i got it right ?!
 
  • #21
SwedishFred said:

The Attempt at a Solution



ω21r122r2
ω2122=r2/r1
2122)=(r2/r1)
ω12=(r2/r1)

I Think i got it right ?!

Yes, you've got it!
 
  • Like
Likes SwedishFred
  • #22
Thanks a lot sir!
we will meet again ;-)
best regards
Fredrik
 

1. What is the meaning of "Central force w1/w2=√r2/r1"?

The equation "Central force w1/w2=√r2/r1" represents the relationship between two central forces, w1 and w2, and their corresponding distances from a central point, r1 and r2. This equation is commonly used in physics to calculate the magnitude of central forces.

2. How is the central force w1/w2=√r2/r1 used in scientific research?

The central force equation is used in a variety of scientific research, particularly in the fields of physics, astronomy, and engineering. It is used to calculate the strength of central forces, such as gravity, and to analyze the motion of objects under these forces.

3. What are some real-world applications of the central force w1/w2=√r2/r1 equation?

The central force equation has many practical applications, including predicting the orbits of planets around the sun, analyzing the motion of satellites, and designing spacecraft trajectories. It is also used in engineering to calculate the forces acting on structures, such as bridges and buildings.

4. How does the central force w1/w2=√r2/r1 relate to Newton's laws of motion?

The central force equation is based on Newton's laws of motion, specifically the second law which states that the force acting on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration. In the case of central forces, the acceleration is caused by the force directed towards the central point, and the equation helps to calculate this force.

5. Can the central force w1/w2=√r2/r1 equation be used in non-central force situations?

No, the central force equation can only be used for central forces, which are forces that are directed towards a central point. Other types of forces, such as friction or air resistance, do not follow this relationship and require different equations for analysis.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
813
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top