- #1

- 184

- 4

^{2}/r. Does that mean the force required for centripetal acceleration is inversely proportional to the radius? If radius is more the lesser centripetal force is required, is this correct?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter avito009
- Start date

- #1

- 184

- 4

- #2

Bystander

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,288

- 1,347

What's "vF=mv^{2}/r

- #3

Suraj M

Gold Member

- 599

- 39

That's if v is constant,radius is more the lesser centripetal force is required, is this correct?

In most situations, ##\omega##(angular velocity) is constant, so try expressing centripetal force in terms of ##\omega##

- #4

- 184

- 4

But if we take the formula 2. F=mω

- #5

Bystander

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,288

- 1,347

Think again. What is "v?"v^{2}/r remains constant

- #6

Suraj M

Gold Member

- 599

- 39

That would be if F is a constant.F= mv2/r. So in this formula we know that as radius increases the speed or velocity increases

Can you specify a situation!!

- #7

- 184

- 4

V is the velocity. But I didnt understand your point.Think again. What is "v?"

- #8

Bystander

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,288

- 1,347

What is "v" in terms of "r?"

- #9

- 184

- 4

V is velocity which is distance/time. So you mean to say that the distance or the radius in this case is more so the velocity is more at the edge. So the Centripetal Force is more. Is this what you meant to tell me?What is "v" in terms of "r?"

- #10

Bystander

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,288

- 1,347

mv2/r

inversely proportional to the radius?

- #11

- 63

- 10

^{2}/r. So in this formula we know that as radius increases the speed or velocity increases. So the term v^{2}/r remains constant. So how can we prove from this formula that the Centripetal force is more if the radius is more.

But if we take the formula 2. F=mω^{2}r. we can easily prove that as the radius increases the Centripetal force required increases. But this inference cant be derived from the first formula.

I'm tryng to interpretate the law: in the first equation the force, that deviate the particle along the orbit, increases together with the speed if we fix the radius, and it decreases together with the radius if we fix the speed.

In the second equation the force increases togheter with the radius, because fixing the angolar speed and increasing the radius, the speed (not explicit here) must increase and then also the force.

- #12

- 63

- 10

I hope that I can convince you there isn't a paradox about the force vs radius that sometime it increases, and sometime it decreases: it's enough that you fix one of the indipendent variabiles and then you'll se how the force changes when at the same time also the other variabile changes.

In other words, if we fix the angular speed, we know that the periferic speed increases when the radius increases and so the force. But if we fix the periferic speed, the angular speed decreases if the radius increases and then the force decreases.

Share: