Exploring the Mysteries of the 33 TeV Energy at CERN SPS

  • Thread starter Nitox33
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cern
In summary, the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) is capable of reaching energies of 33 TeV, as seen on the French Wikipedia page. However, this figure refers to the energy of accelerated lead ions used to create a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP), not the energy of accelerated protons. The difference in mass and charge between the particles allows for easier acceleration and less energy loss due to synchrotron radiation. The SPS can accelerate lead ions up to 33 TeV, but for protons, the energy is limited to 177 GeV per nucleon due to the limitations of the dipole magnets.
  • #1
Nitox33
23
1
hello,
I open this thread to ask some questions about
SPS, it seems it is mounted 33 TeV, but how
he has been able to reach him such energy?
Is not it supposed to go up "only" 450 Gev Env?
Good week
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nitox33 said:
I open this thread to ask some questions about
SPS, it seems it is mounted 33 TeV,

Please provide references to where you have found this figure when asking questions like this. Otherwise it is virtually impossible for us to check your sources.
 
  • #4
My French is not very good, but the 33 TeV seems to refer to the energy of accelerated lead ions smashed together in order to create a QGP, not to the energy of accelerated protons.
 
  • #5
Re hello,
thank you for your reply, I begin to think
wikipedia that it was mistaken in citing this energy!

I think I got the answer to my question! , Thank you;)
 
  • #6
Here is a CERN link about lead acceleration up to 33 TeV using the SPS: http://na49info.web.cern.ch/na49info/Public/Press/general.html
Note that it is easier to accelerate lead to 33 TeV than it would be to accelerate protons to 33 TeV (just as it is easier to accelerate protons to high energies in a circular collider than it is to do it with electrons). The higher mass of the lead ions means you can get to higher energies with less losses in the form of synchrotron radiation.
 
  • #7
Orodruin said:
Here is a CERN link about lead acceleration up to 33 TeV using the SPS: http://na49info.web.cern.ch/na49info/Public/Press/general.html
Note that it is easier to accelerate lead to 33 TeV than it would be to accelerate protons to 33 TeV (just as it is easier to accelerate protons to high energies in a circular collider than it is to do it with electrons). The higher mass of the lead ions means you can get to higher energies with less losses in the form of synchrotron radiation.

Just to state that the important difference between the lead ions and the protons here is the charge, not the mass. A lead ion has a charge of 82 times the proton charge, which means you can accelerate it to 82 times higher momentum with the same magnetic field. Unlike electrons, synchrotron radiation is already not the limiting factor for proton and ions, but the curvature of the motion in the magnetic field is.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
  • #8
ofirg said:
Just to state that the important difference between the lead ions and the protons here is the charge, not the mass. A lead ion has a charge of 82 times the proton charge, which means you can accelerate it to 82 times higher momentum with the same magnetic field. Unlike electrons, synchrotron radiation is already not the limiting factor for proton and ions, but the curvature of the motion in the magnetic field is.

This is what I guess for just dealing with elementary particles I guess. :rolleyes:
But of course this is true, the gyroradius is given by
$$
r_g = \frac{p}{qB}
$$
and for highly relativistic particles ##p \simeq E## so for fixed ##r_g## and ##B##, the energy would be directly proportional to the charge (surprise, surprise, ##82\times 450\mbox{ GeV} \simeq 37\mbox{ TeV}##).
 
  • #9
Protons at design energy lose about 10 keV per turn in the LHC, at the SPS the energy is lower by a factor of ~15 and radiated power scales with ##\gamma^4##, so even with the smaller curvature radius the energy loss should be in the range of tens of electronvolts per turn - completely negligible.
Lead ions lose a factor of ##82^2## more energy at the same gamma-factor, but that is still no problem to compensate.

Proton and ion synchrotrons are always limited by the dipole magnets for the curves, so the maximal energy is proportional to the charge of the accelerated particles.
 
  • #10
To avoid exactly this confusion, physicists usually use GeV per nucleon instead. So at the SPS, the beam energy is 177 GeV per nucleon.
 
  • #11
hi
Thank you for all the answers
good all week
 

What is CERN SPS?

CERN SPS stands for the European Organization for Nuclear Research Super Proton Synchrotron. It is a particle accelerator located in Geneva, Switzerland and is used for conducting high-energy physics experiments.

What is the purpose of the CERN SPS?

The main purpose of the CERN SPS is to accelerate protons and other particles to nearly the speed of light, and then collide them with each other or with stationary targets. This allows scientists to study the fundamental building blocks of matter and the laws of nature.

What kind of experiments are conducted at the CERN SPS?

The CERN SPS is used for a wide range of experiments, including studies of the fundamental forces and particles of the universe, as well as investigations into the nature of matter and antimatter. It has also been used for experiments related to medical research and technology development.

How does the CERN SPS work?

The CERN SPS works by using a series of powerful magnets to guide and accelerate particles through a circular tunnel. The particles are then directed into different experiments or stored in storage rings for further acceleration. The SPS can reach energies of up to 450 GeV (gigaelectronvolts).

What are the benefits of the CERN SPS?

The CERN SPS is a crucial tool for scientific research, allowing scientists to study the fundamental nature of matter and energy. It has also led to numerous technological advancements and has contributed to the development of medical treatments and technologies.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
5
Replies
151
Views
5K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top