15123 said:Whyis it easier to disprove something than to prove something?
Why can you have more certainty of something being untrue?
Why is it hard to say something is true if the experiment's result yields it being true? Why is it a 'big maybe'?
I am not familiar with the swan experiment. Does it have anything to do with black swans?15123 said:It is a statistics question. I followed the example of the 'swan experiment'.
Disproving and proving are two different approaches to understanding the truth of a statement or hypothesis. Disproving involves finding evidence that contradicts the statement, while proving involves finding evidence that supports the statement.
No, a statement cannot be both disproven and proven. If evidence is found that contradicts the statement, it is considered disproven. If evidence is found that supports the statement, it is considered proven.
The certainty of results from disproving or proving is determined through rigorous experimentation and analysis. Scientists use various methods such as statistical analysis, control groups, and replication to increase the reliability and validity of their results.
Both disproving and proving are important in scientific research. Disproving helps scientists eliminate incorrect theories and focus on more accurate explanations, while proving helps scientists support their hypotheses and advance knowledge in their field.
Conflicting results from disproving and proving can be a natural part of the scientific process. In this case, scientists will carefully examine the methods and data used to obtain the results and may conduct further experiments to reconcile the conflicting information. Ultimately, the most reliable and valid evidence will be used to support or refute a statement or hypothesis.