Cgs vs. SI

  • Thread starter Saketh
  • Start date
261
2
I have a simple question.

I understand the quantitative differences between cgs and SI units, but when will I be expected to use one over the other? For example, do physicists prefer one set of units?

Thanks for the help.
 

ranger

Gold Member
1,654
1
I really doesnt matter which system you use. The important thing is to be consistent with units. I was taught with the SI system, so I have come to prefer it, but thats not to say that it is better than cgs. Its a matter of preference and being able to move from one system to another. In fact its better that you be able to move between systems. But I guess the times will soon change and one can only speculate that the SI will out do cgs, as SI is widely used.
 
1,222
2
The short answer is that cgs is on the way out and mks is on the way in.
 

rbj

2,221
7
The short answer is that cgs is on the way out and mks is on the way in.
except the real, hard-core physicists keep saying that the Fine-structure constant is:

[tex] \alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c} [/tex]

which is the cgs way of saying it. the MKS (and general unit system) way to say it is:

[tex] \alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c (4 \pi \epsilon_0)} [/tex]
 

Related Threads for: Cgs vs. SI

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
759
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
728
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top