Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Chain Rule Problem!

  1. Oct 23, 2005 #1
    I have the function:


    I need to find separate, smaller functions which will result in the composition of this function.

    I tried but all I ended up with was:

    Therefore, [tex]y=f(g(x))[/tex]

    However, this is obviously a very inefficient way of finding the composition of this function.

    Can anyone lead me in the right direction?
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 23, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    How about,
    [tex]f(g(x)) = \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x}}[/tex]
    [tex]g(f(g(x))) = \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x}}}[/tex]
  4. Oct 25, 2005 #3
    I don't see how that works, Fermat.


    [tex]f(g(x)) = \sqrt{\sqrt{x + \sqrt{x}}}[/tex]

    You are substituting [tex]g(x)[/tex] under the squareroot of [tex]f(x)[/tex].
  5. Oct 25, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If you're applying the chain rule, you'll always be going from the outside in. Can you
    clarify what you mean by "obviously inefficient"?
  6. Oct 25, 2005 #5
    It's inefficient because I'm splitting up my "big" function into a small function and another big function.

    Shouldn't my composition functions all be small, simple functions?

    Nothing like [tex]g(x)=x+\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x}}[/tex]
  7. Oct 25, 2005 #6
    Fermat......... how does what you told me to do work? I don't understand.
  8. Oct 25, 2005 #7
    I think your way works fine. I have tried but can't find a more elegant way to make the composite right now. You have a simple [tex]f(g(x))[/tex] composite. That's easy to take the derivative of.

    You could rewrite your g(x) as [tex]x + f(x+f(x))[/tex] if you wanted.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook