Consider a solution of particles of type A and B with the following Gibbs potential(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

G(P,T,n_A,n_B)=n_A g_A(P,T) + n_B g_B(P,T)+ (1/2)\lambda_{AA}n_A^2/n + (1/2)\lambda_{BB}n_B^2/n + \lambda_{AB}n_A n_B/n + n_A RT \ln(x_A) + n_B RT \ln(x_B)

[/tex]

where the [itex]n_i[/itex]'s are the number of moles with [itex]x_i=n_i/n[/itex] and [itex]g_i[/itex] are the molar Gibbs potential of each type of particle [itex]i=A,B[/itex]. Also [itex]n_A + n_B = n[/itex] and the [itex]\lambda_{ij}[/itex] are positive constants.

a) If we add [itex]\Delta n_B[/itex] moles of B keeping pressure and temperature constant, calculate the change in in the chemical potential of A.

The chemical potential of A is

[tex]

\mu_A = \left ( \frac{\partial G}{\partial n_A} \right )_{P,T,n_A} = g_A + \lambda_{AA} n_A/n + \lambda_{AB}n_B/n + RT(1 + \ln(x_A))

[/tex]

so changing [itex]n_B[/itex] to [itex]n_B+\Delta n_B[/itex] only changes [itex]\mu_A[/itex] by an amount [itex]\lambda_{AB}\Delta n_B/n[/itex].

Is this right or I'm getting the whole thing wrong?

Edited:

I found the trick [itex]n[/itex] as actually a depence in [itex]n_A[/itex] so you need to take account of this when you differentiate [itex]G[/itex] with respect to [itex]n_A[/itex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Change in chemical potential

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**