#### quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

- Thread starter quasar987
- Start date

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

Homework Helper

- 1,020

- 0

[tex]\int_{\varphi \left( \alpha \right)}^{\varphi \left( \beta \right)} {f\left( x \right)dx} = \int_\alpha ^\beta {f\left( {\varphi \left( t \right)} \right)\varphi '\left( t \right)dt}[/tex]

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

[tex]\int_a^b e^{k(x-2)}dx[/tex]

The "fast-substitution" way everyone use:

Set t = x - 2. then by definition of differential of a function of one variable, dt = (dt/dx)dx = (1)dx = dx. The bounds transform like so: x = a --> t = a-2, x = b --> t = b - 2. Hence, plugging all these substitutions in the original integral yields

[tex]\int_a^b e^{k(x-2)}dx = \int_{a-2}^{b-2} e^{kt}dt[/tex]

The "rigourous-substitution" way goes:

Set [itex]\varphi (t) = t + 2[/itex]. Then [itex]\varphi '(t) = 1[/tex]. [itex]\varphi (t_1) = a \Leftrightarrow t_1 + 2 = a \Leftrightarrow t_1 = a - 2[/itex]. [itex]\varphi (t_2) = b \Leftrightarrow t_2 + 2 = b \Leftrightarrow t_2 = b - 2[/itex]. So now according to the change of variable theorem,

[tex]\int_a^b e^{k(x-2)}dx = \int_{a-2}^{b-2} e^{k(\varphi(t)-2)}(1)dt = \int_{a-2}^{b-2} e^{k(t)}dt [/tex]

It's so much complicated. SO why is it formulated in this complicated way rather than in the simplest way, which seem to always work anyway?

- 663

- 0

Alex

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,845

- 17

I.E. it's more natural to apply the transformation df(x) → f'(x) dx than it is to transform f'(x) dx → df(x)

But, I seem to remember at least one calculus text that stated the reverse formula as a corollary.

As to how people actually

Sometimes, the forward direction is most convenient. For example, when integrating √(1-x²), the most natural thing to do is say x = sin u. Sometimes the reverse direction is more convenient, as you've observed.

Sometimes, it's most convenient to do it

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

Wow that clears some things up!

P.S. Is there a calculus book you've*not * read Hurkyl? :tongue:

P.S. Is there a calculus book you've

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,845

- 17

I've read all but ε of them for some ε > 0...P.S. Is there a calculus book you've not read Hurkyl?

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,771

- 6

Yep, that's definitely too much of them...

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,700

- 872

Fortunately calculus books have the property of all containing exactly the same thing!

- 101

- 0

most of the calculus book contain the same example i have read a few.

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 6K

We Value Quality

• Topics based on mainstream science

• Proper English grammar and spelling

We Value Civility

• Positive and compassionate attitudes

• Patience while debating

We Value Productivity

• Disciplined to remain on-topic

• Recognition of own weaknesses

• Solo and co-op problem solving

• Topics based on mainstream science

• Proper English grammar and spelling

We Value Civility

• Positive and compassionate attitudes

• Patience while debating

We Value Productivity

• Disciplined to remain on-topic

• Recognition of own weaknesses

• Solo and co-op problem solving