Ice Ages & Tilting Earth: Separating Fact from Fiction

In summary, the article discusses a study that claims ice ages correspond with extreme changes in the tilt of the Earth. The science behind it is currently unknown, but the study claims that changes in incoming solar radiation and in seasons are triggering changes in greenhouse gases and in ice cover, century after century. Some scientific papers have been written about this topic.
  • #1
HankDorsett
Gold Member
82
29
TL;DR Summary
Recent study I've read
I came across an article regarding a study that claimed ice ages correspond with extreme changes in the tilt of the Earth. I'm curious what others think about this. Is this just another unqualified scientific study put out there to confuse the climate change debate? Is the science behind it accurate?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
HankDorsett said:
I came across an article

Are you going to tell us which one and where we can find it?
 
  • #4
This is not a new idea, try looking up "Milankovitch cycles". However, I don't quite see how you could read the article and call +/- 1 degree changes in the Earth's tilt "extreme changes".
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, davenn and berkeman
  • #5
HankDorsett said:
Summary: Recent study I've read

I came across an article regarding a study that claimed ice ages correspond with extreme changes in the tilt of the Earth. I'm curious what others think about this. Is this just another unqualified scientific study put out there to confuse the climate change debate? Is the science behind it accurate?

Milankovitch cycles are viewed as the trigger of those changes. But the rate of changes in temperature cannot be explained by the changes in solar radiation and in the seasons. Neither the Milankovitch cycles are matching exactly the temperature interpreted from ice cores. In fact to explain the changes, feedback cycles are involved. Notably ice-albedo, CO2 and water vapor feedbacks. So the current understanding is that changes in incoming solar radiation and in seasons are triggering changes in greenhouse gases and in ice cover, century after century.

Some scientific publications about this:
1984, Modelling the global climate response to orbital forcing and atmospheric carbon dioxide changes: https://www.nature.com/articles/310757a0
1993, Water vapour, CO2 and insolation over the last glacial-interglacial cycles: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.1993.0110
2006, Ice-driven CO2 feedback on ice volume: https://www.clim-past.net/2/43/2006/cp-2-43-2006.pdf
2011, The role of orbital forcing, carbon dioxide and regolith in 100 kyr glacial cycles: https://www.clim-past.net/7/1415/2011/cp-7-1415-2011.pdf

About the actual climate change, the Milankovitch (or orbital) parameters are changing in the direction of a cooling since the beginning of the Holocene (so for several millennia).
You can visualize here the changes: https://biocycle.atmos.colostate.edu/shiny/Milankovitch/

Edit: I add this review paper I just found.
2015, Quaternary glaciations: from observations to theories: http://www.science.earthjay.com/ins...ssion_03/QuatStrat_Discussion_Paper_Week4.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, CPW, jim mcnamara and 1 other person
  • #6
@Genava , in addition to this nice list of papers, I would also add the following paper:

2013, Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis of ice-sheet volume:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12374
I think this paper does a very nice job of showing that, while the Milankovitch cycles are the main driver, other factors, like the rate of rebound of the continents after ice sheet melting, play significant roles as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, jim mcnamara and Genava
  • #7
Thanks for all the responses, it's a lot to go over. All of this seems to prove my belief on climate change, climate science is way more complicated then led to believe.
 
  • #8
HankDorsett said:
Thanks for all the responses, it's a lot to go over. All of this seems to prove my belief on climate change, climate science is way more complicated then led to believe.
Of course it's complicated. What reputable climate scientist ever said otherwise?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #9
phyzguy said:
Of course it's complicated. What reputable climate scientist ever said otherwise?
I wasn't referring to any reputable climate scientists. Most of what we hear about climate change is from non educated sources and unfortunately they only talk about one issue.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #10
HankDorsett said:
I wasn't referring to any reputable climate scientists. Most of what we hear about climate change is from non educated sources and unfortunately they only talk about one issue.

If you are looking for reliable sources with articles and explanations wrote by researchers, there are CarbonBrief and ClimateFeedback.
 
  • #11
Could the Earth's wobble be a result of a massive meter impact and can that impact point be located by the wobble we have today-?

My guess is the Gulf of Mexico was created by this impact.

What’s your guess?
 
  • #12
fastfreecurrent said:
Could the Earth's wobble be a result of a massive meter impact and can that impact point be located by the wobble we have today-?

My guess is the Gulf of Mexico was created by this impact.

What’s your guess?
What "wobble"? Do you mean the tilt of the Earth's axis relative to the plane of the Earth's orbit? Or do you mean the long-term small changes in inclination ad ellipticity. Thease latter are well explained by the gravitational pull of the sun and moon
 
  • #13
phyzguy said:
What "wobble"? Do you mean the tilt of the Earth's axis relative to the plane of the Earth's orbit? Or do you mean the long-term small changes in inclination ad ellipticity. Thease latter are well explained by the gravitational pull of the sun and moon

The Chandler wobble or variation of latitude is a small deviation in the Earth's axis of rotation relative to the solid earth,[1] which was discovered by American astronomer Seth Carlo Chandler in 1891. It amounts to change of about 9 metres (30 ft) in the point at which the axis intersects the Earth's surface and has a period of 433 days.[2][3] This wobble, which is a nutation, combines with another wobble with a period of one year, so that the total polar motion varies with a period of about 7 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_wobble
 
  • #14
fastfreecurrent said:
Could the Earth's wobble be a result of a massive meter impact and can that impact point be located by the wobble we have today-?
No. A meteor impact can change the rotation rate and axis, but it doesn't lead to any long-term wobbling. There were also no impacts large enough to be relevant for Earth's rotation after the early phase where Earth formed.
 

1. What causes an Ice Age?

An Ice Age is caused by a combination of factors, including changes in Earth's orbit around the sun, changes in the tilt of Earth's axis, and changes in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. These factors can lead to a decrease in the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth's surface, resulting in cooler temperatures and the formation of large ice sheets.

2. How long do Ice Ages last?

The length of an Ice Age can vary, but on average they last for about 100,000 years. However, this time frame can be influenced by other factors such as the strength of the sun's radiation and the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

3. Is the Earth currently in an Ice Age?

No, the Earth is currently in a period of interglacial, meaning there is no extensive ice coverage on the planet. The last Ice Age ended about 11,700 years ago.

4. How does Earth's tilt affect the climate?

Earth's tilt, also known as its obliquity, affects the distribution of solar radiation on the planet. When the tilt is at its maximum, the poles receive more sunlight and experience warmer temperatures, while the equator receives less sunlight and experiences cooler temperatures. This can lead to changes in global climate patterns.

5. Can human activities impact the Earth's tilt?

No, human activities do not have a direct impact on Earth's tilt. However, human-caused climate change can indirectly affect Earth's tilt by altering the distribution of ice and water on the planet's surface. This can lead to changes in the Earth's mass distribution and potentially influence its tilt over long periods of time.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
971
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
806
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
784
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top