Changing photon direction

  • Thread starter Tauneu
  • Start date
  • #1
4
0
Is there a process that can artificially change the direction of photons?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,835
7,707
Is there a process that can artificially change the direction of photons?
Yes, it's called a mirror :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and russ_watters
  • #3
berkeman
Mentor
59,447
9,557
Is there a process that can artificially change the direction of photons?
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Do you mean like reflection off of a mirror? Or refraction at the interface between two dielectrics? Or diffraction at the edge of an object? Or gravitational lensing?

What do you mean by "artificial" versus natural?
 
  • #4
4
0
I should have remembered to add that I meant very high energy photons.
 
  • #5
434
247
not sure what do you mean by artificially, but I am sure you heard about reflection, refraction or scattering.
 
  • #6
berkeman
Mentor
59,447
9,557
I should have remembered to add that I meant very high energy photons.
Like in x-ray telescopes?

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/toolbox/xray_telescopes1.html

https://img.purch.com/w/660/aHR0cDo...pZ2luYWwvMTAwMTA4LWNoYW5kcmEtYXJ0LTAyLmpwZw==

L3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAwNC85MDYvb3JpZ2luYWwvMTAwMTA4LWNoYW5kcmEtYXJ0LTAyLmpwZw==.jpg
 

Attachments

  • L3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAwNC85MDYvb3JpZ2luYWwvMTAwMTA4LWNoYW5kcmEtYXJ0LTAyLmpwZw==.jpg
    L3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAwNC85MDYvb3JpZ2luYWwvMTAwMTA4LWNoYW5kcmEtYXJ0LTAyLmpwZw==.jpg
    74.8 KB · Views: 404
  • #7
4
0
Very interesting. What about gamma radiation from reactor accidents? If some device could be flown into the area quickly enough, could this be redirected? I guess the next question if it were possible to redirect gamma radiation, where would it ultimately be moved to, higher in the atmosphere, probably not a good idea, if this whole scenario seems far-fetched, maybe take it a step further and redirect all this gamma radiation into space...
 
  • #8
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,155
4,995
You can redirect gamma rays using methods similar to x-rays, but it's probably easier to just absorb them with shielding. But it doesn't actually matter much in the case of nuclear reactors as the main danger by far is the release of radioactive fallout, not the release of gamma rays. The atmosphere will absorb most gamma rays anyways.

Also realize that you need to physically intercept gamma rays just like you have to put a physical object (mirror or lens) in the path of visible light in order to reflect or refract it. So unless you device physically surrounds the source then it's useless.
 
  • #9
4
0
I was thinking such a device could be hovered above the leaking source, of course it would be quite large, maybe like a funnel, conical a/o cylinder pointed downwards above it, the interior of the casing made of... I'll look it up, to absorb the gamma rays. Would there be no need to have some process, some type of scattering or conversion, to try and maneuver the rays into it, the device would have to cover the source completely?
Thank you everyone for answering.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,835
7,707
Would there be no need to have some process, some type of scattering or conversion, to try and maneuver the rays into it, the device would have to cover the source completely?
Drakkith just answered that already. Reread post #8
 
  • #11
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,155
4,995
Would there be no need to have some process, some type of scattering or conversion, to try and maneuver the rays into it, the device would have to cover the source completely?

The problem is that you wouldn't be able to funnel the gamma rays into your device in the first place. Gamma ray telescopes have to use long concentric cylinders of metal in order to focus the incoming gamma rays. The angle of incidence has to be very shallow otherwise the gamma rays simply pass right through or get absorbed. This makes it extremely impractical as a method of channeling gamma rays away from a location and towards another. Your device would be absolutely massive and you'd still absorb a significant portion. You're far better off just piling up a bunch of lead or some other material that readily absorbs gamma rays.
 

Related Threads on Changing photon direction

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
603
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
811
Top