Changing the base logarithms homework

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
NewScientist
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
log_2(x) + log_4(x) = 2

I've tried everything i can think of, including changing the base - to no avail.

Any ideas?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's doable by changing base, but you can also do:

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x + \log _4 x} = 4^2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x} 4^{\log _4 x} = 16 \Leftrightarrow x^2 \cdot x = 16[/tex]
 
Can you explain those steps to me because I don't really understand
 
- We raise both sides as exponents of base 4.
- Then we use the fact that [itex]a^{b + c} = a^b \cdot a^c[/itex]
- Then we can simplify the powers and logs because they are inverse operation.

Please specify what steps you have trouble with.

You can also do:

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 x^2 + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 \left( {x \cdot x^2 } \right) = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 \left( {x^3 } \right) = 2[/tex]

And then take 4^ again of both sides.
 
Here's how you can change base:
By definition, for y>0
[tex]y=2^{\log_{2}y}=4^{\log_{4}y}[/tex]
Thus, from the last identity, we get:
[tex]\log_{2}y\log_{4}2=\log_{4}y[/tex]
But:
[tex]2=4^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]
thus:
[tex]\log_{4}2=\log_{4}4^{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
or:
[tex]\log_{2}y=2\log_{4}y[/tex]
Thus, setting y=x, we have:
[tex]\log_{2}x+\log_{4}x=3\log_{4}x=\log_{4}x^{3}[/tex]
Your original equation is therefore:
[tex]\log_{4}x^{3}=2[/tex]
Or:
[tex]x^{3}=4^{2}[/tex]
which agrees with Tide's answer..
 
This is going to sound pathetic so i apologise but i do not know how these steps work!

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x + \log _4 x} = 4^2[/tex]

[tex]4^{\log _2 x} 4^{\log _4 x} = 16 \Leftrightarrow x^2 \cdot x = 16[/tex]

I'm really sorry but can you give me an anser for first principles - this isn't a requirement of the questoin but i actually want to understand this!
 
Well, we use that:
[tex]\begin{gathered}<br /> a^{\log _a x} = x \hfill \\<br /> a^{b + c} = a^b \cdot a^c \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered}[/tex]
 
i didn't know the result a^log_a(x) = x
 
NewScientist said:
i didn't know the result a^log_a(x) = x
That is because they are by definition inverse operations.

[tex]a^{\log _a x} = x \Leftrightarrow \log _a \left( {a^{\log _a x} } \right) = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x \cdot \log _a a = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x = \log _a x[/tex]

So it is indeed correct.
 
NewScientist said:
log_2(x) + log_4(x) = 2

I've tried everything i can think of, including changing the base - to no avail.

Any ideas?!
you probably know the formula
[tex]log_a (x^n) = n log_a (x)[/tex], where [tex]x>0[/tex]

There is a very useful similar formula:
[tex]log_{a^n} (x) = (1/n) log_a (x)[/tex]
(can be derived from [tex]log_a (x) = 1/ log_x (a)[/tex] ).

For your equation
[tex]log_2 (x) + log_4 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) + log_{2^2} (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) + (1/2) log_2 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex](3/2) log_2 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) = 4/3[/tex]
[tex]x = 2^{4/3}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
TD said:
That is because they are by definition inverse operations.

[tex]a^{\log _a x} = x \Leftrightarrow \log _a \left( {a^{\log _a x} } \right) = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x \cdot \log _a a = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x = \log _a x[/tex]

So it is indeed correct.
TD, actually this property is just a definition of logarithm:
[tex]{\log_a x}[/tex] is such a number [tex]n[/tex] that
[tex]a^{n} = x[/tex]
Substituting [tex]{\log_a x}[/tex] for [tex]n[/tex]
[tex]a^{\log_a x} = x[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Which is why I said "they are by definition inverse operations".

What came after that was just a way of using logarithm properties he might know to show that it is equal.