Chaotic Milky Way and Dark Matter distribution

In summary, the press release and article discuss the kinematic heating of the Milky Way disk and suggest that it may be caused by massive compact objects, among other possible sources. However, it is unclear how this hypothesis may affect our understanding of dark matter in spiral galaxies. The article also discusses the newly measured dispersion of star velocities perpendicular to the galactic plane and how this may lead to further explanations for the observed phenomenon.
  • #1
hellfire
Science Advisor
1,051
1
This paper:
http://www.edpsciences.org/papers/aa/pdf/press-releases/aa0959.pdf

...press release:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-08-04.html

suggests that the kinematic heating (statistical dispersion of velocities in the perpendicular plane to the galactic plane) of the Milky Way disk, may be due to massive compact objetcs (but must not; three other sources are mentioned: spiral arms effects, satellite galaxies and gas clouds).

Besides from the fact that the paper is quite interesting, my question is how far such an hypothesis could question the constraints put on the distribution and nature of dark matter in spiral galaxies. Let's say: what is the influence of dark matter on kinematic heating of the disk, if any?

Regards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
hellfire said:
This paper:
http://www.edpsciences.org/papers/aa/pdf/press-releases/aa0959.pdf

...press release:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-08-04.html

suggests that the kinematic heating (statistical dispersion of velocities in the perpendicular plane to the galactic plane) of the Milky Way disk, may be due to massive compact objetcs (but must not; three other sources are mentioned: spiral arms effects, satellite galaxies and gas clouds).
.

Hi hellfire, I scanned the press release and part of the article but couldn't find the part referring to dark matter or massive compact halo objects. If you have a page reference and want to point us at the spot, that would help.

My impression is that they spent 20 years measuring the dispersion of star velocities perpendicular to the galactic plane and so they can say
for the first time how much the stars are bobbing up and down thru the plane.

My impression is that now that there is a statistical handle on the up/down dispersion people will rush to find explanations to account for it and all kinds of mechanisms will be proposed for why the dispersion is whatever it is and not something else.

But it seems early to guess.

BTW this bobbing up and down thru the plane, like a ball on a rubberband, is something astronomers have been aware of for a long time----and they must have had a rough idea of how much other stars do it, just not measured as accurately as these people have now done.

I remember someone was speculating that periodic mass extinctions on Earth could be explained by the sun bobbing up and down thru the galactic plane and taking the Earth thru regions where there were clouds of bad stuff. Did you happen to see that speculation, I don't remember more detail unfortunately and did not see any followup on it.

Did you get any idea from the article, or elsewhere, of what can have damped the up and down oscillations of stars thru the galactic plane?
since the whole thing contracted into a plane there must have been a lot of infalling stars and originally a lot of up and down velocity, where did it go?
must be some standard explanation for this but I don't know it
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the Chaotic Milky Way model?

The Chaotic Milky Way model is a hypothesis that suggests that the Milky Way galaxy is constantly changing and evolving, with stars and gas constantly moving and interacting with each other. This model challenges the traditional view of a static, organized galaxy and suggests that chaos is a key component of our galaxy's structure.

2. How does the Chaotic Milky Way model explain the distribution of dark matter?

The Chaotic Milky Way model proposes that the distribution of dark matter in our galaxy is also constantly changing and chaotic. This means that the dark matter is not evenly distributed, but rather clumped and disrupted by the movement of stars and gas. This can explain some of the discrepancies between observations and predictions of dark matter distribution.

3. What evidence supports the Chaotic Milky Way model?

There is growing evidence from observations and simulations that support the Chaotic Milky Way model. For example, studies of the motions of stars in our galaxy have revealed unexpected patterns and movements that cannot be explained by a static galaxy model. Additionally, simulations of galaxy formation and evolution have shown that chaos is a natural consequence of the interactions between stars and gas.

4. How does the Chaotic Milky Way model impact our understanding of galaxy formation?

The Chaotic Milky Way model challenges the traditional understanding of galaxy formation, which suggests that galaxies form in an orderly and predictable manner. The chaotic nature of our own galaxy suggests that this may not be the case for all galaxies, and that chaos can play a significant role in shaping their structures.

5. What are the implications of the Chaotic Milky Way model for future research?

The Chaotic Milky Way model opens up new avenues for research and exploration in the field of astrophysics. It challenges us to rethink our current models and theories of galaxy formation and evolution, and to develop new methods and techniques for studying chaotic systems. It also highlights the need for more detailed observations and simulations to better understand the complex dynamics of our galaxy and the role of chaos in shaping it.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
905
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
5
Replies
142
Views
112K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
8
Replies
264
Views
15K
Back
Top