1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Characteristic Polynomials

  1. Jan 29, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Suppose A is a 2x2 real matrix with characteristic polynomial f(t) = t2 - 5t +4. Find a real polynomial g(t) of degree 1 such that (g(A))2 = A.

    Suppose A is a 2x2 complex matrix with A2 ≠ O. Show that there is a complex polynomial g(t) of degree 1 such that (g(A))2 = A.

    2. Relevant equations
    Cayley-Hamilton Theorem

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I found that det A = 4 and from f(A) = 0, I found the inverse of A to be 1/4 * A(A-5).

    I am completely stuck after this. I let A be a matrix of 4 variables a, b, c, and d, then tried to solve for the variables but ended up with really long and messy terms.

    Can someone give me a lead as to what the g(t) has to do with f(t)?
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 29, 2010 #2

    Ben Niehoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You know that (g(A))^2 = A, and g is linear, so why don't you write g(A) = aA + b and see what happens.
  4. Jan 29, 2010 #3
    I tried that too before but got nowhere so I thought it was irrelevant. I get simply a quadratic for A, where 0 = a2A2 + (2ab - 1)A + c2. Does this have to do with f(t) = t2 -5t + 4?

    EDIT 1:
    I equated the coefficients and found that a = +/- 1 and b = -/+ 2. So then I just substitute this back into the coefficients for g(t)?

    EDIT 2:
    All right, I got it now, thanks. =)

    Is the second question similar to the first?

    EDIT 3:
    I tried to find the characteristic polynomial for A with a, b, c, d variable entries, then I isolated for A, used the (forgot name) method to get a quadratic equation. Is this correct?

    EDIT 4:
    Never mind, I think I solved it. I isolated for A (dividing both sides by a+ d is possible because from the determinant, we get that a + d =/= 0).

    A = (1/(a+d)) A2 + (ad-bc)/(a+d)
    A + eA = (1/(a+d)) A2 + eA + (ad-bc)/(a+d) , e =/= -1

    Then, I isolated for A again, equated it to the square of a linear equation g(t) = mt + n, found m and n in terms for the 5 variables above, isolated for e in terms of the other 4 variables, and substituted it all into g(t). The only restriction is that ad - bc =/=, but the questions asks for any complex function.

    Is this all right? Thanks.
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2010
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook