http://books.google.com.au/books?id=x-XZBJngdM4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This post is referring to page 35-36.

I just find it odd that this book doesn't change it's mathematical description to align with the fact that a ring produces a component force up smaller than the force that it would produce if it weren't pointing straight up.

In other words, taking an infitesmal ring of small dipoles that interact with a single dipole of the same type above it by a force proportional to 1/(r^6) (dipole-dipole interaction), wouldn't the force be something involving the unit vectors of the vectors connecting the dipole being studied and the ring of dipoles?

More to the point, wouldn't it be the integral per portion of dipoles in the ring dq with some function based off of the distance from the dipoles(charge analogy), so the integral of (kdq/(x^2 + y^2)^(6/2)) cosθ = integral of (kxdq/(x^2 + y^2)^5/2)?

This might help illustrate what I'm talking about: http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Charge distribution question.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

- Similar discussions for: Charge distribution question.

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**