- #1

- 164

- 8

- David J Griffiths

But how s it valid for some conductor like →

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter person_random_normal
- Start date

- #1

- 164

- 8

- David J Griffiths

But how s it valid for some conductor like →

- #2

- 164

- 8

- #3

- 32,781

- 9,890

1) Maxwells equations.

2) Electrostatic: ##J=0##, ##d\rho/dt=0##, ##dE/dt=0##, ##dB/dt=0##

3) Conductor: ##J=\sigma E##

Assume there is charge in the interior. Then by Gauss law there is an E field in the interior. Then by assumption 3) there is a current. This contradicts assumption 2). Therefore there can be no charge in the interior.

- #4

- 164

- 8

if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential

- #5

- 164

- 8

please reply

somebody !!

somebody !!

- #6

- 20,137

- 10,875

$$\sigma \vec{E}=\vec{j}=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \vec{E}=0.$$

The electric charge density at every point is given by Gauss's Law (Heaviside-Lorentz units)

$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\rho.$$

Since ##\vec{E}=0## inside the conductor also ##\rho=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=0## inside the conductor. So if the conducting body is overall charged, the charge must be on its surface.

Caveat: To be more accurate, of course microscopically the entire body consists of charged particles (atomic nuclei and electrons). So there are charges inside the body but they are compensating each other precisely in the static case, when looked from a macroscopic (coarse-grained) point of view. So within macroscopic electrodynamics the macroscopic charge distribution vanishes in conductors for electrostatic situations.

- #7

- 164

- 8

so #4 is right ?

- #8

- 164

- 8

if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential

- #9

- 164

- 8

by the way can you put this physically , I don't know this mathThe electric charge density at every point is given by Gauss's Law (Heaviside-Lorentz units)

⃗∇⋅⃗E=ρ.

- #10

- 32,781

- 9,890

Only in the electrostatic case, yes. This does not hold in magnetostatics or electrodynamics.

if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential

- #11

SammyS

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 11,520

- 1,124

Yes. The surface is equipotential.

if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential

That does not mean that the surface charge is uniformly distributed.

- #12

- 164

- 8

Yes. The surface is equipotential.

That does not mean that the surface charge is uniformly distributed.

Then we should have current over the surface, as its made of conductor, does that happen in steady state ?

It won't be electrostatics then !

- #13

SammyS

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 11,520

- 1,124

I didn't mention current, nor did I imply it.Then we should have current over the surface, as its made of conductor, does that happen in steady state ?

It won't be electrostatics then !

The surface charge density is not one uniform value over the whole surface. It varies from location to location, but it is static.

- #14

- 164

- 8

I didn't mention current, nor did I imply it.

The surface charge density is not one uniform value over the whole surface. It varies from location to location, but it is static.

that means it is equipotential

- #15

- 32,781

- 9,890

Yes.that means it is equipotential

Share: