How Does Closing Switches Affect Charge Stored in Parallel Plate Capacitors?

In summary: What does that tell you about the steady state potential and charge on that capacitor?The center capacitor will have a potential of V and a charge of Q.
  • #1
songoku
2,294
325

Homework Statement


Four uncharged metal plates of the same area are placed in vacuum and separated by equal distances. They are connected by conducting wires to two resistors, two open switches and a battery. The thickness of the plates is negligible, and their area is sufficiently large. S1 is now closed, and after sufficient time elapses, a charge with quantity Q is stored in A. Next, as S1 is kept closed, S2 is also closed. After sufficient time elapses, a charge with quantity of electricity Q' is stored in A. What is the ratio of Q'/Q?
Untitled_zpsa3cbh1vd.png


Homework Equations


Q = C.V
C = ε0 . A / d

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the circuit acts as capacitor.

When S1 is closed and S2 is open, the circuit is like capacitor between plate A and D because potential difference only applied to the two plates by the battery. Assume the distance between two adjacent plates is d, then the distance of AD = 3d. So the charge stored on A = ε0 . A / 3d . V

When both switches closed, I don't have idea how the circuit works...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here's a hint for these types of problems: When plates are stacked in parallel like this, adjacent pairs behave as individual capacitors, and these capacitors are effectively connected in series.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #3
gneill said:
Here's a hint for these types of problems: When plates are stacked in parallel like this, adjacent pairs behave as individual capacitors, and these capacitors are effectively connected in series.

1. How can adjacent pairs behave as individual capacitors?
2. When both switches closed, is it still capacitor?
 
  • #4
songoku said:
1. How can adjacent pairs behave as individual capacitors?
2. When both switches closed, is it still capacitor?

1. The electric field induces charge separation on intervening plates. The facing plate surfaces act as capacitors.
upload_2016-9-5_8-54-44.png


2. Yes. But you should draw the equivalent circuit to see what closing S2 does to the circuit. Note that the values of the resistors are unimportant as you're looking for steady-state conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #5
gneill said:
1. The electric field induces charge separation on intervening plates. The facing plate surfaces act as capacitors.
View attachment 105514

2. Yes. But you should draw the equivalent circuit to see what closing S2 does to the circuit. Note that the values of the resistors are unimportant as you're looking for steady-state conditions.

Sorry for late reply

When both switches are closed, positive charge will accumulate on plate A and negative charge will accumulate on plate D. I am not sure how to proceed then.

Plate A will induce negative charge on plate B and plate D will induce positive charge on plate C. Although S2 is closed, there won't be any change on charge accumulated on plate B and C because it is not closed circuit??
 
  • #6
It might be easier to see what is going on if you draw the circuit diagram that is equivalent to the plate setup. Each gap between plates represents a capacitor and they are all connected in series. So before switch two closes there are three capacitors of equal value in series with the battery V and resistor R. At steady state what potential do you expect to see across each of the capacitors, and hence what's an expression for their charges?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #7
I can imagine there will be three capacitors connected in series when switch 2 is open. If we assume the capacitance of each capacitor is C, the total capacitance will be C/3 and the value of Q will be C/3 . V

I don't understand what will happen to the circuit when switch 2 is closed. Because plate B and C are now connected by wire, the circuit will consist only two capacitors connected in series (capacitor AB and capacitor CD)?
 
  • #8
songoku said:
I can imagine there will be three capacitors connected in series when switch 2 is open. If we assume the capacitance of each capacitor is C, the total capacitance will be C/3 and the value of Q will be C/3 . V
Yes, good.
I don't understand what will happen to the circuit when switch 2 is closed. Because plate B and C are now connected by wire, the circuit will consist only two capacitors connected in series (capacitor AB and capacitor CD)?
A sufficient time after the switch S2 closes the circuit will reach steady state, and because of the capacitors in the path to the voltage source that means no current flowing (Except for transient activity capacitors block DC current).

Now, the center capacitor has a resistor across it via the closed switch. What does that tell you about the steady state potential and charge on that capacitor?
upload_2016-9-23_6-48-4.png
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #9
gneill said:
A sufficient time after the switch S2 closes the circuit will reach steady state, and because of the capacitors in the path to the voltage source that means no current flowing (Except for transient activity capacitors block DC current).

Now, the center capacitor has a resistor across it via the closed switch. What does that tell you about the steady state potential and charge on that capacitor?
View attachment 106406

Let me try.

The energy stored in the center capacitor will be used up so there is no charge accumulated on the plates of C2. C2 will behave like short circuit so now the circuit consists only two capacitors (C1 and C3) in series?
 
  • #10
songoku said:
Let me try.

The energy stored in the center capacitor will be used up so there is no charge accumulated on the plates of C2. C2 will behave like short circuit so now the circuit consists only two capacitors (C1 and C3) in series?
Well, I'd say that at steady state the potential across C2 will be zero. But essentially you are correct in that C1 and C3 will be the only capacitors holding a charge. So what must be the charge on them?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #11
gneill said:
Well, I'd say that at steady state the potential across C2 will be zero. But essentially you are correct in that C1 and C3 will be the only capacitors holding a charge. So what must be the charge on them?

The total capacitance is C/2, so the value of Q' = C/2 . V and the ratio of Q'/Q will be 3/2
 
  • #12
Yes, that looks right.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Yes, that looks right.

Thank you very much
 

What is the definition of "Charge on Parallel Plates"?

The charge on parallel plates refers to the distribution of electric charge on two parallel plates. This occurs when opposite charges are placed on the two plates, causing an electric field to form between them.

How is the charge on parallel plates calculated?

The charge on parallel plates can be calculated using the equation Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the potential difference between the plates. The capacitance can be determined by the equation C = εA/d, where ε is the permittivity of the material between the plates, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between them.

What factors affect the charge on parallel plates?

The charge on parallel plates is affected by several factors, including the potential difference between the plates, the distance between the plates, and the material between the plates. The type and amount of charge placed on the plates also play a role in determining the overall charge.

What are the applications of charge on parallel plates?

Charge on parallel plates has various applications, including in capacitors, which are used in electronic circuits to store electric charge. It is also utilized in electrostatic precipitators, which remove particles from gas streams, and in particle accelerators, which use electric fields to accelerate charged particles.

What are some common misconceptions about charge on parallel plates?

One common misconception is that the charge on parallel plates is always evenly distributed across the plates. In reality, the distribution of charge can vary depending on the factors mentioned above. Another misconception is that the force between the plates is always attractive. This is not always the case, as the force can be repulsive if like charges are placed on the plates.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
144
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
909
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
912
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
781
Back
Top