Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Cheating or not

  1. True

    3 vote(s)
  2. False

    34 vote(s)
  1. May 26, 2010 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    10 chars
  2. jcsd
  3. May 26, 2010 #2
    Of course it's cheating if you don't get caught what the heck kinda question is that? If you think it IS only cheating if you get caught then why you in a relationship in the first place???

    EDIT: Waaaiiit I assumed that this had to do with relationships :rofl:. My answer still stands if it was cheating on a test or cheating anything else. That's why it's still called cheating...
  4. May 26, 2010 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Any particular reason for this poll?

    Cheating is cheating, no matter if you get caught or not. The moon is there even when I'm not looking! XD
  5. May 26, 2010 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's a reaction to another thread where people seem to be supporting the screwball notion that it's only cheating if you get caught or you hurt yourself.
  6. May 26, 2010 #5
    Weird, so to them the statement 'I cheated but thankfully, I didn't get caught' doesn't exist?? I don't get it... If there are specific rules set out to limit an advantage, or ability and you around, or through those rules then you are cheating. It has nothing to do with being caught or not...
  7. May 27, 2010 #6
    Do you believe that or is this just semantics?
  8. May 27, 2010 #7
    is this directed at me or the OP?
  9. May 27, 2010 #8


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The definitions of the word are satisfied whether or not one gets caught.

    Oxford says:

    cheat | ch ēt|

    1 [ intrans. ] act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination : she always cheats at cards.
    • [ trans. ] deceive or trick : he had cheated her out of everything she had.
    • use inferior materials or methods unobtrusively in order to save time or money : they cheat by photographing mashed potatoes instead of ice cream.
    informal be sexually unfaithful : his wife was cheating on him.

    2 [ trans. ] avoid (something undesirable) by luck or skill : she cheated death in a spectacular crash.
    archaic help (time) pass : the tuneless rhyme with which the warder cheats the time.

    a person who behaves dishonestly in order to gain an advantage : a liar and a cheat.
    • an act of cheating; a fraud or deception.

    I voted false.
    Last edited: May 27, 2010
  10. May 27, 2010 #9
    I voted false.

    In an academic setting where the idea is to test individual candidates on an even playing field. Then yes most definately 'cheating' is cheating and you should be kicked in the arse for it.

    However i've acutally learned a few things in the real world. If it explicitly states you can't do it, you can't do it. If it's not explicity stated, and you find an advantage over your rivals by explaiting a grey area that thats fine.
  11. May 27, 2010 #10
    Who voted true that's what I want to know...
  12. May 27, 2010 #11
    Cheating is a choice. More often than not, cheating pays off. But in the interest of equidistance and fairness an instructor should be completely intolerant of a cheater who got caught.
  13. May 27, 2010 #12


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    It's amazing how there are many many people who do believe this is true.
  14. May 27, 2010 #13
    It's probably nothing else than cognitive dissonance. Some cheaters feel a internal conflict after cheating, and they solve it by changing the beleifs about the act of cheating.

    It's only the most visible side. Other ppl who cheat once may solve they conflict by changing the attitude toward cheating, and never do it again. This is less visible.

    So, it's no screwball. It's human nature.

    All this becomes fairly irrelevant if a person looks at cheating simply as a unfair advantage which pays off as long as you don't get caught. This is an equilibrium, they do no fool themselves cheating is not what it is, but they acknowledge they can get a very big pay-off if they can get away with it. So it becomes a risk taking issue.
  15. May 27, 2010 #14
    Let me get this straight are we talking about cheating? Or Cheating? I'm not totally sure what one we are talking about here.
  16. May 27, 2010 #15

    Chi Meson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    They are called "Politicians."

    C'mon. You were all thinking it. All I did was say it.

    OW! quit it quit it. OW!
  17. May 27, 2010 #16
    Actually I voted true :) Figured someone had too.
  18. May 27, 2010 #17
    No, to the guy who thinks cheating is not cheating unless he gets caught. I thought that was the OP, but apparently not.
  19. May 27, 2010 #18


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Lordy no.

    In https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2735052&postcount=15", I get all shirty about someone who does think this way. I thought I'd throw it open to the board to see if maybe I was crazy or something.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  20. May 27, 2010 #19


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    :rofl: I like that

    Cheating is cheating weither you get caught or not :tongue:
  21. May 27, 2010 #20


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    They only voted true if we catch them...
  22. May 27, 2010 #21
    you can't prove that scientifically, though.
  23. May 27, 2010 #22


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Of course he can. He need only ask me, who was watching when he wasn't.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook