Understanding Stokes' Theorem for a Specific Vector Field and Parametric Curve

In summary, the conversation discussed using Stokes' theorem to evaluate a surface integral and the projection of a curve onto the xy plane. The vector field and parametric representation of the curve were given, as well as the equation for Stokes' theorem. The curl of the vector field was calculated and the unit normal vector to the circle was determined. The integral was then set up, but there were some issues with the calculations. The conversation also touched on the meaning of the integrals being equal to zero and how to solve certain types of integrals.
  • #1
JD_PM
1,131
158
Homework Statement
I want to check Stokes' theorem for the exercise below.
Relevant Equations
##\int_{a} (\vec \nabla \times \vec F) \cdot d \vec a = \oint_{C} \vec F \cdot d \vec l##
I want to check Stokes' theorem for the following exercise:

Consider the vector field ##\vec F = ye^x \hat i + (x^2 + e^x) \hat j + z^2e^z \hat k##.

A closed curve ##C## lies in the plane ##x + y + z = 3##, oriented counterclockwise. The parametric representation of this curve is defined as:

$$C = (1+cost) \hat i + (1+sint) \hat j + (1 - cost - sint) \hat k$$

Where ##t[0, 2\pi]##.

Stokes Theorem states:

$$\int_{a} (\vec \nabla \times \vec F) \cdot d \vec a = \oint_{C} \vec F \cdot d \vec l$$

Evaluating the LHS:

The curl of ##\vec F## :

$$\vec \nabla \times \vec F = 2x \hat k$$

This is an important point: How can I know the projection on the xy plane of the surface enclosed by C?

I am told that it is the circle with radius 1 and center (1, 1) but I do not know why. We can verify it graphically but I am seeking for a numerical method to get it, rather than having to draw the plot.

The unit normal vector to the circle is:

$$\hat n = (x-1) \hat i + (y+1) \hat j$$

Setting up the integral:

$$d \vec a = \hat k dxdy$$

$$\int_{a} (\vec \nabla \times \vec F) \cdot d \vec a = \int_{a} 2x dxdy = 2\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{1} rcos \theta drd \theta = 0$$

BUT I GET 0... What does that imply?

Evaluating the RHS:

$$\oint_{C} \vec F \cdot d \vec l = \oint_{C}[ye^x dx + (x^2 + e^x)dy + z^2e^z dz]$$

But we know how the curve looks like:

$$x = 1 + cost$$
$$y = 1 + sint$$
$$z = 1 - cost - sint$$

So it is a matter of solving the integral:

$$\oint_{C} = C_1 + C_2 + C_3$$

Where:

$$C_1 = \int_{0}^{2\pi} (1+sint) e^{1+cost}(-sint)dt$$

$$C_2 = \int_{0}^{2\pi} [(1+cost)^2 + e^{1+cost}](cost)dt$$

$$C_3 = \int_{0}^{2\pi} (1-cost-sint)^2e^{1-cost-sint}(sint-cost)dt$$

BUT How can I solve ##C_1##?

To sum up; these are the points I want to understand:

1) How to know the projection on the xy plane of the surface enclosed by C.
2) What does ##\int_{a} (\vec \nabla \times \vec F) \cdot d \vec a = \oint_{C} \vec F \cdot d \vec l = 0## mean? (##\vec F## is not a conservative field, so that is not the reason...).
3) How to solve ##C_1## kind of integrals (any trigonometric trick?). I tried to solve it using https://www.integral-calculator.com/ but founds no primitive...

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (360).png
    Screenshot (360).png
    18.4 KB · Views: 180
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
JD_PM said:
How can I know the projection on the xy plane of the surface enclosed by C?
How do you usually find a projection of any point onto the xy plane?

3) You do not always need a primitive to solve an integral. Some terms you can throw away based on symmetry arguments.

2) It does not "mean" anything other than that the integrals are zero. That can happen even if the field is not conservative. The point with a conservative field is that it holds regardless of the curve C.

JD_PM said:
The unit normal vector to the circle is:


^n=(x−1)^i+(y+1)^jn^=(x−1)i^+(y+1)j^​

\hat n = (x-1) \hat i + (y+1) \hat j

Setting up the integral:


d→a=^kdxdy​
This is not correct. It is unclear to me what you are trying to do with ##\hat n##, but it certainly is not a unit normal to anything. Also, ##d\vec a## is not in the ##\hat k## direction based on what the plane is. Or are you taking some integration surface that is not in the plane ##x+y+z = 3##? You should specify what surface you are using.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
  • #3
Let me reply point per point.

Orodruin said:
How do you usually find a projection of any point onto the xy plane?

With vectors I see how could I find the projection; let's say we have:

$$\vec A = A_x \hat i + A_y \hat j + A_z \hat k$$

And we want the projection of this vector on the z axis (##A_z##). Then we just have to take the dot product with a unit vector in the z direction:

$$A_z = A \cdot \hat k$$

I am wondering how to do the same but with surfaces.
 

1. What is Stokes' Theorem?

Stokes' Theorem is a mathematical theorem that relates the surface integral of a vector field over a surface to the line integral of the same vector field along the boundary of the surface.

2. When is Stokes' Theorem used?

Stokes' Theorem is used in vector calculus to evaluate line integrals and surface integrals, and to calculate the circulation of a vector field around a closed loop in three-dimensional space.

3. What are the conditions for applying Stokes' Theorem?

In order to apply Stokes' Theorem, the surface must be bounded by a simple closed curve, the vector field must be continuously differentiable, and the surface must be oriented in a consistent manner.

4. How is Stokes' Theorem related to Green's Theorem?

Stokes' Theorem is a generalization of Green's Theorem, which relates a line integral around a simple closed curve to a double integral over the region enclosed by the curve.

5. Can Stokes' Theorem be used to evaluate any surface integral?

No, Stokes' Theorem can only be used to evaluate surface integrals over surfaces that satisfy the conditions mentioned in question 3. Otherwise, other methods such as the Divergence Theorem may be used.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
163
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
766
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
817
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
558
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
457
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
768
Back
Top