Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Chem 102 Lab Question:

  1. Mar 14, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    The question asks: Using the measured cell potential and the Nernst equation, calculate the [Ag+] in the test solution. However, you guys will need a little bit of background information to answer this question since it is a lab. First of all this reaction was:

    Ag2CO3(s) <-> 2Ag+(aq) +CO3^2-(aq)

    Also the Nernst equation we are using is the following:
    Ecell = E^0cell -0.05916V/n logQcell

    And, the Ecell potential that I calculated was 0.280V

    2. The attempt at a solution

    So I've made an attempt at this question, but I'm not too positive if I'm solving it correctly. From the reaction we know that n=1 (1 electron being transfered between the reactants and products). Therefore:

    0.280V = 0.800V-0.468V(Standard potentials off CDS)- 0.05916V/1 log[Ag+]^2
    0.280V = 0.332V-0.5916V log[Ag+]^2
    1.026 = log[Ag+]^2
    1.013 = log[Ag+]
    [Ag+] 0.00562 = 5.63X10^-3 mol/L

    However, I'm not too positive if this is correct or if I should be looking in the Chemistry Data Sheet for the standard potentials of the cathode and anode. Thanks for any help guys. :D
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 14, 2007 #2
    Actually, here n will be 2 since the total number of electrons traded is 2. Your calculation looks wrong. If 1.013=log[Ag+], then [Ag+] should be [tex]10^{1.013}[/tex] which should be greater than 10, not smaller.
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2007
  4. Mar 14, 2007 #3
    Ahhh okay, yeah I'm not sure why I said 1, it clearly is n=2 for the number of electrons being traded. That makes a bit more sense. Thank you for your help.

    My only other question is whether or not I got the standard cell potentials right from the chemistry data sheet. Because I know that the cathode is Ag in this case, so looking on the CDS, we find it is 0.800V and then the anode I said was from the equation Ag2CO3(s) + 2e^- -> 2Ag(s) + CO3^2- which is 0.468. I'm assuming those are correct for this case, and that it's just an error in my calculation. Thanks again though.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook