1. Aug 18, 2012 #1

   moont14263

   

   My question is about the shaded area in the attachment?
   How did the author get that all the elements of order p or 4 of L are contained in K? I mentioned the abstract but I do not think there is a need for that.
   
   Help?

    

   Attached Files:

   • 

     Untitled20.png

     File size:

     50.3 KB

     Views:

     80

   moont14263, Aug 18, 2012
2. 
   Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org

   • • Game over? Computer beats human champ in ancient Chinese game
   • • Simplifying solar cells with a new mix of materials
   • • Imaged 'jets' reveal cerium's post-shock inner strength
3. Aug 18, 2012 #2

   micromass

   

   Staff Emeritus

   Science Advisor

   Education Advisor

   Insights Author

   2016 Award

   Take [itex]x\in L[/itex]. Then there is a g in G such that [itex]x\in T^g[/itex] and thus there is a y in T such that [itex]x=gyg^{-1}[/itex]. If x has order p or order 4, then so does y. But by the previous sentence, y is contained in K. Since K is normal, we have that also x is in K.

    

   micromass, Aug 18, 2012
4. Aug 18, 2012 #3

   moont14263

   

   The symbol [itex]L=\bigcup_{g \in G} T^{g}[/itex], does it mean the union of sets or [itex]L=<T^{g},g \in G>[/itex]and, if it the union of sets, then how did he gets that [itex]L[/itex] equals to that union?

    

   moont14263, Aug 18, 2012

• Log in with Facebook
• Log in with Twitter

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in