China is reminding me more and more of Nazi Germany

  • News
  • Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date
  • #1
sid_galt
502
1
If http://www.halturnershow.com/ChineseDefenseMinisterTalksWarAgainstUS.html [Broken] is true then well guess the consequences.

I don't know about you but China is reminding me more and more of Nazi Germany with Russia playing the role of fascist Italy. And now the two are holding "PEACE" military exercises (note the contradiction) in which they are testing ICBM's?

Hmmmmm....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
TRCSF
60
0
I doubt it's true. Look at the guy's main page. He's a white supremacist.
 
  • #3
Lisa!
Gold Member
620
97
China wants to start a war against US!? :bugeye: :bugeye: I don't think WW3 would start by China! It's more like a joke!
 
  • #4
sid_galt
502
1
TRCSF said:
I doubt it's true. Look at the guy's main page. He's a white supremacist.

I hadn't checked his main page. Though this sounds just like the rhetoric from Communist China.

Remember a few weeks ago one of them was threatening nukes against the US?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
sid_galt
502
1
Lisa! said:
China wants to start a war against US!? :bugeye: :bugeye: I don't think WW3 would start by China! It's more like a joke!

Who else would start WW3 against the US except China?
 
  • #6
Smurf
369
3
You don't honestly believe that do you sid? The guy is obviously pulling it out of his ass.
 
  • #7
Lisa!
Gold Member
620
97
Why do you think ww3 starts against US? Perhaps US starts ww3 against another country or 2 other countries start a war against each other and US gets involved then.
 
  • #8
Smurf
369
3
sid_galt said:
I hadn't checked his main page. Though this sounds just like the rhetoric from Communist China.

Remember a few weeks ago one of them was threatening nukes against the US?
:confused: No. I don't. Refresh my memory.
 
  • #9
Smurf
369
3
sid_galt said:
Who else would start WW3 against the US except China?
First of all, WW3 doesn't start when US goes to war. The US is not the world. Secondly, the US is the one pursuing the aggressive foreign policy right now, and so is logically more likely to be the ones starting the war. Thirdly, your question assumes China has more reason to attack the US than anyone else, which they don't.
 
  • #10
cronxeh
Gold Member
973
10
Well that doesnt surprise me one bit

Lets see.. Population of North America + South America + Australia + Russia + Germany = 1055 million
which is still less than that of India alone = 1080 million, and still even less than that of population of China = 1300 million

Man these Chinese love to reproduce :rolleyes:

Lets just hope Chinese women arent crazy for Hindu guys :surprised
 
Last edited:
  • #11
TRCSF
60
0
sid_galt said:
Though this sounds just like the rhetoric from Communist China.
QUOTE]
Doesn't sound like Chinese rhetoric to me. Sounds like white supremacist rhetoric poorly trying to imitate what he thinks Chinese rhetoric sounds like.
 
  • #12
outsider
24
0
sid_galt said:
Though this sounds just like the rhetoric from Communist China.
Why would sid_galt introduce something so hatemongering to discuss if not to cause an uproar and try to gain some much lost credibility from a number of other threads?

Unfortunately, this causes me to lose more respect for you sid. How long have you been on the internet? Do you believe everything you read? Or is that what your daddy taught you?

Anyone else who looks at the link that sid provided, please do more research before agreeing with a guy who clearly has no basis or support for his arguments.

Sid, I challenge you to bring more proof from a more reliable source please. I don't think the other media channels would ignore something this newsworthy.
Doesn't sound like Chinese rhetoric to me. Sounds like white supremacist rhetoric poorly trying to imitate what he thinks Chinese rhetoric sounds like.
it sure does... it was definately skewed... I highly doubt China calls chinese people "yellow people"... LOL... :rofl: Only ignorant KKK types don't know that there is a difference...

Sid, you should've noticed this... but perhaps you aren't smart enough to know the difference yourself.

I never heard of such a thing... FYI, yellow people have their differences too and there would not likely ever be an agenda on behalf of "yellow people". I'm gonna wait till my wife gets home and see if that translation is even accurately translated into chinese.

Why don't you pull the news from the Ron Jeremy Media Network while your at it? Do you consider white supremacists credible sources for objective news?

Well done sid_galt :rofl: btw.. i'm not trying to make you look a fool, I'm just calling what I see.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Entropy
469
0
WW3 is more likely to come from Israel vs Palistine or India vs Pakistan. Only takes one nuke at the wrong time and they'll be firing nukes all over the place.
 
  • #14
TRCSF
60
0
Entropy said:
WW3 is more likely to come from Israel vs Palistine or India vs Pakistan. Only takes one nuke at the wrong time and they'll be firing nukes all over the place.
Personally, I think U.S./Iran would be more likely than Israel/Palestine or India/Pakistan.
 
  • #15
Has anyone read Michael T. Klare's "Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict"? Klare gives an excellent analysis of the likely causes of new conflicts in this book (amazon readers have given the book a 5-star rating and, from my reading, it is excellently researched). You can read an excerpt at the amazon website if you're interested - .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Antiphon
1,681
3
Forget about the loser white supremacist.

But the Chinese speech is quoted correctly. Here's a link
to an independent source which has the transcript.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
Andy
57
10
The only country that has the power to have a war with the US is china, no other country has the resources to go to war with the US. And even that war would be quite a short and decisive one.
 
  • #18
TRCSF
60
0
Andy said:
The only country that has the power to have a war with the US is china, no other country has the resources to go to war with the US. And even that war would be quite a short and decisive one.

Really. Seems like the U.S. has got its hands full with a few thousand geurillas.
 
  • #19
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
223
84
Did Ward Churchill found Wikipedia?

http://www.theepochtimes.com/123,87,,1.html [Broken]

More to the point:
http://www.theepochtimes.com/123,92,,1.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
Andy
57
10
Would be easy enough to drop a nuke on iraq though, just a shame about those oilfields being in the way.
 
  • #21
TRCSF
60
0
Andy said:
Would be easy enough to drop a nuke on iraq though, just a shame about those oilfields being in the way.

Right, so they won't drop a nuke. It's still a loss.
 
  • #22
russ_watters
Mentor
21,605
8,720
Antiphon said:
Forget about the loser white supremacist.

But the Chinese speech is quoted correctly. Here's a link
to an independent source which has the transcript.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html [Broken]
Did you read the 'we-can't-vouch-for-its-authenticity' disclaimer at the top...?

No, I'm not inclined to believe it either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
TRCSF
60
0
russ_watters said:
No, I'm not inclined to believe it either.

Yeah, the bit where he explains who Chairman Mao is and how he was a great national hero seems a bit suspicious.

:rolleyes:
 
  • #24
Andy
57
10
Right, so they won't drop a nuke. It's still a loss.

Where there's freedom there's victory!
 
  • #25
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,840
1,003
I think that in 100 years it will be easily seen that Bush already started WIII.
 
  • #26
TRCSF
60
0
Andy said:
Where there's freedom there's victory!

Right, freedom to get nuked and have their oil stolen. War is peace. Torture is freedom. Black is white.
 
  • #27
Entropy
469
0
Where there's freedom there's victory!

Please tell me you're being sarcastic.
 
  • #28
Smurf
369
3
Andy said:
Would be easy enough to drop a nuke on iraq though, just a shame about those oilfields being in the way.
yeah... those poor oil fields... never mind the PEOPLE though.
 
  • #29
:uhh: Why would the Chinese defense minister outline a plan to attack the US in a public speech?
 
  • #30
Smurf
369
3
Skyhunter said:
:uhh: Why would the Chinese defense minister outline a plan to attack the US in a public speech?
Who cares, why would he intentionally draw parallels between China and Nazi Germany in a public speech?

And this is during/after all their fuss about Japan being mean in ww2? :rofl:
 
  • #31
Smurf
369
3
BobG said:
Did Ward Churchill found Wikipedia?

http://www.theepochtimes.com/123,87,,1.html [Broken]
Ward Churchill was a journalist with no programming ability at all. Wikipedia was founded by Jimmy Wales. The term wiki and wiki technology was first created by Ward Chunningham, possibly a typo, but somehow I doubt it was.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #32
Smurf said:
Who cares, why would he intentionally draw parallels between China and Nazi Germany in a public speech?
Maybe because the speech is fiction.

Smurf said:
And this is during/after all their fuss about Japan being mean in ww2? :rofl:
So, Sid_Galt is an agent for the Japanese ministry of propaganda. And this thread is an attempt to divert our attention from the real threat which is the secret Japanese plan for world domination by secretly negotiating with OPEC to raise the price of oil, thereby allowing Toyota and Honda to take over the automotive market with their hybrids, forcing the big three automakers into bankruptcy, destroying the US manufacturing base, and and.....I see it now, it is all so clear. Run for the hills the end is near aaaaagghhh.

oops time for my medication.
 
  • #33
outsider
24
0
Antiphon said:
Forget about the loser white supremacist.

But the Chinese speech is quoted correctly. Here's a link
to an independent source which has the transcript.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html [Broken]
Antiphon,

U again? When will you give it up? I shut you up in another thread and you come and join a new one to start flogging the same skewed, racist comments using incredible sources.... show me something real... or else I will just have no choice but to slam the credibility of your sources... You can gain/lose your own credibility... good luck with coming out of the closet :rofl: chiaraponda!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Antiphon there are white supremist forums such as Stormfront where the type of nonsense you try to push is positively relished so why not post there where you will be appreciated. Most people here (with perhaps one or two exceptions) are too intelligent to fall for this line of b s.
 
  • #35
Lisa!
Gold Member
620
97
Ivan Seeking said:
I think that in 100 years it will be easily seen that Bush already started WIII.
Do you think anyone would be alive to see that? I don't think anyone would be alive if ww3 would happen! :wink:
 

Suggested for: China is reminding me more and more of Nazi Germany

  • Last Post
3
Replies
99
Views
8K
Replies
71
Views
13K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
43K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
644
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
29
Views
3K
Top