1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Chiral currents of a Dirac plane wave

  1. Mar 1, 2012 #1
    I am currently trying to check the formula for the chiral current of the Dirac equation for a plane wave solution (found here ), that is,

    [itex]j_{R}^\mu = \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R[/itex]

    [itex]j_{L}^\mu = \psi_L^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_L[/itex]


    [itex] \psi_R = I( \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \sigma^i n_i \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2})) \xi e^{ix^\mu p_\mu} [/itex]

    [itex]\psi_R = I( \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) - \sigma^i n_i \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2})) \xi e^{ix^\mu p_\mu}[/itex]

    χ being the rest frame spinor, θ the rapidity and n the direction of the momentum.

    So for the right-handed current, I get

    [itex]\psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = ([\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) ] \xi)^\dagger \sigma^\mu [\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) ] \xi [/itex]

    [itex]\psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \cosh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger \sigma^\mu \xi + \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger( \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) + (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu ) \xi + \sinh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \xi [/itex]

    Using the following hyperbolic identities,

    [itex]\sinh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} [\cosh(\theta) - 1] = \frac{1}{2} [\gamma - 1] [/itex]

    [itex]\cosh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} [\cosh(\theta) + 1] = \frac{1}{2} [\gamma + 1] [/itex]

    [itex]\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} \sinh(\theta) = \frac{1}{2} \beta \gamma[/itex]

    And defining the spin vector

    [itex]\xi^\dagger \sigma^\mu \xi = s^\mu = (1,\vec{s}) [/itex]

    I get the following :

    [itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \frac{1}{2} [ \gamma \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu + \sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i ) \xi + \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu -\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i ) \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \{\sigma^\mu, \sigma^i\} \xi ] [/itex]

    [itex]\beta_i [/itex] being [itex]\beta n_i [/itex], and [itex]\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i [/itex] coming from [itex](\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n})[/itex] (I can't find the exact proof to show it to be so, but I think this is correct - though it may be the problem). So far this is pretty much the results indicated. But then, if I try finding out the results using this identity :

    [itex]\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i = \bar{\sigma}^\mu[/itex]

    I finally get this formula :

    [itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \frac{1}{2} [ \gamma \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu + \bar{\sigma}^\mu) \xi + \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu -\bar{\sigma}^\mu ) \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \{\sigma^\mu, \sigma^i\} \xi ] [/itex]

    Which gives the following components for the current :

    [itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^0 \psi_R = \gamma \xi^\dagger \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \sigma^i \xi = \gamma + \gamma \beta_i s^i[/itex]

    Which is the correct result, but for the spatial components I find

    [itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^j \psi_R = \xi^\dagger \sigma^j \xi + \beta^j \gamma \xi^\dagger \xi = s^j + \beta^j \gamma[/itex]

    Which according to the book lacks a term in [itex]+ (\gamma-1) \beta^i s_i \beta^j [/itex], unless I am misinterpreting the notation used (the results are page 16).
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?