Choose h and k so that the matrix has a unique solution

  • Thread starter Arnoldjavs3
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Matrix
In summary, the task is to find values for h and k in the system of equations represented by the augmented matrix ##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 2 & h & | & k \end{bmatrix}## in order to have a unique solution. By putting the matrix in row reduced echelon form, it is determined that h cannot equal 4, and the value of k does not matter. It is also noted that the value of h=0 would result in a linearly dependent first row
  • #1
Arnoldjavs3
191
3

Homework Statement


$$
A = \begin{bmatrix}
1 & 2\\
2 & h\\ = k
\end{bmatrix}
$$
Mod note:
Corrected augmented matrix:
##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 2 & h & | & k \end{bmatrix}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so apparently it's a bad idea to bring this into row reduced echelon form. How can I formulate this into having a unique solution then? I nkow that if you want infinite solutions, just make the two rows dependant on each other but I'm not sure how to approach it for a unique solution. (And if we want no solutions, make it so that the system is inconsistent by getting an answer like 0!=1)

What conditions do i need to fulfill here for it to have a unique solution?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your matrix has a mistake in it. Can you fix it? Can you give the full problem statement? What is the system you are working with? Why is it a bad idea to put it into row echelon form?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
hmm.. I'm unsure of how to make an augmented matrix in latex.

it's meant to be :
row one: 1x + 2y = 2
row two: 2x + h = k
 
  • #4
Is it 2x + h = k or 2x + hy = k?
 
  • #6
Okay. Now, we can get started. Put that matrix in row reduced echelon form. This system has a unique solution if it has rank 2 (why?). Try to find the values for h and k such that the system has rank 2. If you saw determinants, there is an easier method.
 
  • #7
the determinant is h-4 correct? how does this help me?
 
  • #8
for row reduced echelon form i got:

x = (2h-2-k)/h
y = (2+k)/h

I believe rank indicates the linearly independent columns in a matrix, in this case rank 2? Do I just input values for h and k so that x = 1 and y = 1?
 
  • #9
Yes, you calculated the determinant correctly. There is a theorem that says that this matrix has rank 2 if and only if the determinant is non zero. What can you conclude? Did you see such theorem?
 
  • #10
I have not seen such a theorem before. But I'm having troubles drawing the connections here - I believe that the two rows must be independent of each other, but they also need to be consistent. How does rank play into this? If it is of rank 2, then they will have two rows/columns that are independent right? But how does this information help me into finding values for h, and k?
 
  • #11
If it has rank 2, then the system has a unique solution. Just what you are looking for! Yes, this is equivalent with saying that the rows/colums must be linear independent. By using that, you can find the values of h and k for which the system has a unique solution.

Also, the row reduced form is a matrix. Not another system (yet it corresponds to an equivalent system). I got something though, so you might want to look at that again.
 
  • #12
hmm... how about x = (2h-2k)/h
and y = k/h. Do i just choose random values?>
 
  • #13
Arnoldjavs3 said:
hmm.. I'm unsure of how to make an augmented matrix in latex.
I edited your post to add the corrected augmented matrix. You can right click on what I added to see how it's done.
 
  • Like
Likes Arnoldjavs3
  • #14
Arnoldjavs3 said:
hmm... how about x = (2h-2k)/h
and y = k/h. Do i just choose random values?>

This isn't a guess game! Show your work so we can see where things go wrong.
 
  • #15
##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 2 & h & | & k \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & h-4 & | & k-4 \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & 1 & | & (k-4)/(h-4) \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & | & 2 - ((2k-8)(h-4)) \\ 0 & 1 & | & (k-4)/(h-4) \end{bmatrix}##

and as such i got h-4 = 2h-2k

and the other equation gets h-4 = k-4
so h=k and then substituting that in equation one, i get h=4.

I think this calls for infinite solutoins and not a unique one though
 
  • #16
Arnoldjavs3 said:
##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 2 & h & | & k \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & h-4 & | & k-4 \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & 1 & | & (k-4)/(h-4) \end{bmatrix}##

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & | & 2 - ((2k-8)(h-4)) \\ 0 & 1 & | & (k-4)/(h-4) \end{bmatrix}##

and as such i got h-4 = 2h-2k

and the other equation gets h-4 = k-4
so h=k and then substituting that in equation one, i get h=4.

I think this calls for infinite solutoins and not a unique one though

Well done! That seems correct. Now look at the second step you did:

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & h-4 & | & k-4 \end{bmatrix}##

From here, you have enough information to solve the problem. What happens when ## h = 4, k = 4, h \neq 4, k \neq 4##? It is clear that if ##h = 4##, we either have an infinite amount of solutions (##k = 4##) or the system is not consistent (##k \neq 4##). So we deduce that ##h \neq 4##. Does the value of k matter?
 
  • Like
Likes Arnoldjavs3
  • #17
Math_QED said:
Well done! That seems correct. Now look at the second step you did:

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & | & 2 \\ 0 & h-4 & | & k-4 \end{bmatrix}##

From here, you have enough information to solve the problem. What happens when ## h = 4, k = 4, h \neq 4, k \neq 4##? It is clear that if ##h = 4##, we either have an infinite amount of solutions (##k = 4##) or the system is not consistent (##k \neq 4##). So we deduce that ##h \neq 4##. Does the value of k matter?

Just a question - does k still have to correspond to what h is(it should right - because it would be inconsistent otherwise)? Its bothering me that I can't algebraically find specific, unique values. What if h was 3?
-y = k - 4 - > would k have to be 3?
 
  • #18
Arnoldjavs3 said:
Just a question - does k still have to correspond to what h is(it should right - because it would be inconsistent otherwise)? Its bothering me that I can't algebraically find specific, unique values. What if h was 3?
-y = k - 4 - > would k have to be 3?

You are finding the values of h and k such that the system has a unique solution. The only restriction on h is that it can't be equal to 4. Thus ##h \in \mathbb{R} - \{4\}##. We can solve the system then, and we deduce that the value of k won't affect whether the system has a unique solution. So ##k \in \mathbb{R}##.

Conclusion: The system has a unique solution if:

##h \in \mathbb{R} - \{4\}##
##k \in \mathbb{R}##.

As for your question what happens when h = 3? Try it out! You will find a unique solution for the system. The same goes when h is any real number not equal to 4.
 
  • Like
Likes Arnoldjavs3
  • #19
Arnoldjavs3 said:
I have not seen such a theorem before. But I'm having troubles drawing the connections here - I believe that the two rows must be independent of each other, but they also need to be consistent. How does rank play into this? If it is of rank 2, then they will have two rows/columns that are independent right? But how does this information help me into finding values for h, and k?

Whether the rows are independent refers only to the left-hand sides of the equations, so depends only on ##h.## If the two rows on the left are linearly independent, it does not matter what you have on the right, so instead of ##2## and ##k## you could have any ##a## and ##b##; the solution would still be unique, but of course, would vary as for different ##a,b##.

If the two rows on the left are linearly dependent, the equations are consistent for some right-hand-sides ##a,b## (so, for some value of ##k## in your case), but the solution would NOT be unique. For other right-hand sides the equations would be inconsistent, having no solutions at all.
 
  • Like
Likes Arnoldjavs3
  • #20
Ray Vickson said:
Whether the rows are independent refers only to the left-hand sides of the equations, so depends only on ##h.## If the two rows on the left are linearly independent, it does not matter what you have on the right, so instead of ##2## and ##k## you could have any ##a## and ##b##; the solution would still be unique, but of course, would vary as for different ##a,b##.

If the two rows on the left are linearly dependent, the equations are consistent for some right-hand-sides ##a,b## (so, for some value of ##k## in your case), but the solution would NOT be unique. For other right-hand sides the equations would be inconsistent, having no solutions at all.

Yeah this makes a lot more sense now. I didn't understand what made rows linear independent, I wish my textbook had gone over this. I was wondering why it had to be h that couldn't be 4, and not k but this clarifies that.
 
  • #21
Math_QED said:
You are finding the values of h and k such that the system has a unique solution. The only restriction on h is that it can't be equal to 4. Thus ##h \in \mathbb{R} - \{4\}##. We can solve the system then, and we deduce that the value of k won't affect whether the system has a unique solution. So ##k \in \mathbb{R}##.

Conclusion: The system has a unique solution if:

##h \in \mathbb{R} - \{4\}##
##k \in \mathbb{R}##.

As for your question what happens when h = 3? Try it out! You will find a unique solution for the system. The same goes when h is any real number not equal to 4.
Hi guys, I'm coming back to this problem and I wanted to know why h can't be 4 in this scenario. Is it because the second row will be 0,0? Why does that make this not a unique solution?
 
  • #22
Arnoldjavs3 said:
Hi guys, I'm coming back to this problem and I wanted to know why h can't be 4 in this scenario. Is it because the second row will be 0,0? Why does that make this not a unique solution?

If ##h = 4##, and we have ##k \neq 4##

We have that ##0x + 0y = c## for a certain real number ##c## that is non zero. Hence, the system has no solution.

If ##h = 4##, and we have ##k = 4##

Then, we find that ##0x + 0y = 0##. This means, we can leave this equation out of the system as any ##(x,y)## is suited. Thus, we end up with a system in 2 unknowns and 1 equation, thus, we have an infinite amount of solutions (so not a unique one, that's for sure)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Arnoldjavs3

What does it mean to have a unique solution in a matrix?

A unique solution in a matrix means that there is only one set of values for the variables that satisfy all the equations in the matrix. This means that the system of equations has a single solution that can be determined through Gaussian elimination or other methods.

How do I determine the values for h and k to make a matrix have a unique solution?

To determine the values for h and k, you can use various methods such as Gaussian elimination, substitution, or graphing. These methods involve manipulating the equations in the matrix to eliminate variables and solve for the remaining variables.

What happens if I choose incorrect values for h and k in a matrix?

If you choose incorrect values for h and k in a matrix, it can result in a system of equations that has no solution, infinitely many solutions, or a unique solution. This depends on the specific values chosen and the equations in the matrix.

Is it always possible to choose values for h and k to make a matrix have a unique solution?

No, it is not always possible to choose values for h and k to make a matrix have a unique solution. This is because the equations in the matrix may be dependent, resulting in infinite solutions, or inconsistent, resulting in no solution.

Why is it important to have a unique solution in a matrix?

Having a unique solution in a matrix is important because it allows us to accurately solve systems of equations and make predictions about real-world situations. It also provides a way to check the consistency of the equations and ensure that no errors were made in the calculations.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
515
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
267
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
906
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top