Sorry for the undescriptive title, but I couldn't think of a better one.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

My question is essentially this: is the following procedure correct?

a=-kx and we want v.

Multiply both sides by v to get:

[tex] \frac {d^2x} {dt^2} * \frac {dx} {dt} = -kx *\frac {dx} {dt} [/tex]

Now, by dt, and some rearranging :

[tex] (\frac {d^2x} {dt^2} dt) * \frac {dx} {dt} = -kx *dx [/tex]

And the step which I'm not convinced can be done:

[tex]( \int \frac {d^2x} {dt^2} dt) * \frac {dx} {dt} = -k \int x *dx [/tex]

and so we end up with v^2 = -(kx^2)/2 +c which is but an errant 1/2 away from what I need.

I just don't trust integrating a wrt t, while having a v just sitting there as if it were a constant. The only reason that I haven't already disregarded it is that it checks out if you analyse the dimensions...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Choosing what's integrated

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**