Exploring the Distinction between Chronon and Planck's Time: Facts and Debates

  • Thread starter Nim
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary, there is some disagreement among websites about the exact measurements and significance of Planck's time and the term "chronon" is not a well-established concept. Planck's time is a unit of time proposed by Max Planck in 1899 and is approximately 0.539 E-43 seconds. It is derived from a set of natural units and can be used to calculate other units, such as length and area. To remember the values of Planck units, one can memorize the formula for area and calculate the other units from there. The symbols E and G represent exponential notation and the gravitational constant, respectively.
  • #1
Nim
74
0
What is the difference between a chronon and Planck's time? A few websites said they were the same thing. But other websites showed Planck's time as being smaller than a chronon. And those websites didn't always agree on how small Planck's time or a chronon is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Originally posted by Nim
What is the difference between a chronon and Planck's time? A few websites said they were the same thing. But other websites showed Planck's time as being smaller than a chronon. And those websites didn't always agree on how small Planck's time or a chronon is.

One way to approach this question is to ask what has traditionally usually been meant by "Planck time"

Planck proposed a set of natural units in 1899 to a meeting of the Prussian Academy and the time unit he proposed was
for practical purposes the same as what is called "Planck time" today----about 0.539 E-43 second.

For over 100 years the Planck time unit has been this.

What the "chronon" is must depend on whatever writer is talking. It is not a well-established traditional thing, so could mean anything someone wants it to mean. The basic string theory scale is not solidly nailed down so if there is a "chronon" in that context it could be drifting around changing from author to author.

Here is how to remember Planck units:

Memorize what the area is and get all the rest from that.

The area is hbar G/c3

Therefore the length is sqrt(hbar G/c3)

The unit time is how long light takes to go unit length so it equals unit length divided by c. Or you can divide by c2 inside the square root and get

Planck time unit equals sqrt(hbar G/c5)


Since Planck time is 0.539 E-43 second, if you multiply by E45 you get 53.9 seconds which is on same scale as a ordinary minute.

So next time someone on telephone says "please wait a minute. I put you on hold for a minute" remember that this means

E45 Planck time units, or maybe you like it better written

1045 Planck time units
 
  • #3
Thanks for the answser.

This isn't a physics question. But how do you make those floating numbers like that 45 you have by the 10?
 
  • #4
Originally posted by Nim
Thanks for the answser.

This isn't a physics question. But how do you make those floating numbers like that 45 you have by the 10?

A2 is written like this (but with the spaces removed)

A[s u p]2[/s u p]


subscripts are written like superscripts except you say "sub"
instead of "sup"

if you want to see how anyone made a math symbol they wrote in their post, click on "quote" below their post AS IF you were going to reply and wanted to quote them in your reply-----you can look at how they typed stuff and you don't have to reply unless you want----you can just back away
 
  • #5
marcus said:
about 0.539 E-43 second.
The area is hbar G/c3
marcus said:
Therefore the length is sqrt(hbar G/c3)
What are E and G?
 
  • #6
E45 just means 10^45
G is the gravitational constant
 

1. What is the difference between Chronon and Planck's time?

The main difference between Chronon and Planck's time lies in their origin and units of measurement. Chronon is a hypothetical unit of time proposed in quantum physics, while Planck's time is a fundamental constant in the field of physics. Chronon is measured in units of time, while Planck's time is measured in units of length, mass, and time.

2. Is there any scientific evidence for the existence of Chronon?

Currently, there is no direct experimental evidence for the existence of Chronon. It is a theoretical concept proposed to understand the nature of time at the quantum level. However, some studies have shown that certain physical phenomena, such as black holes, can exhibit characteristics similar to those predicted by Chronon theory.

3. Why is there a debate surrounding the distinction between Chronon and Planck's time?

The debate surrounding Chronon and Planck's time arises from the fact that they both try to explain the nature of time at the quantum level, but in different ways. Some scientists argue that Chronon is a more fundamental unit of time, while others believe that Planck's time is a better representation of the smallest unit of time in the universe.

4. Can Chronon and Planck's time coexist?

Yes, Chronon and Planck's time can coexist as they are both theoretical concepts used to understand the nature of time at the quantum level. They may represent different aspects or perspectives of the same underlying reality. However, more research is needed to determine the relationship between these two concepts.

5. How does understanding the distinction between Chronon and Planck's time contribute to our understanding of the universe?

Studying the distinction between Chronon and Planck's time can provide insights into the fundamental nature of time and its relationship with space and matter. It can also help us better understand the behavior of particles at the quantum level and potentially lead to advancements in quantum computing and other technologies. Additionally, it can contribute to the development of a unified theory of physics that can explain the workings of the entire universe.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
971
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
49
Views
2K
Back
Top