1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Circular aperture

  1. Apr 28, 2005 #1
    Here is the problem...
    Calculate the resolving power of a microscope with a 1.30cm aperture using 540nm light. The index of refraction of the lens slows the light inside the glass to 1.98x10^8m/s.

    i just know the formula tetha=1.22(lambda)/D, but i dont know how to derive the formula since i dont know any eqaution related to this matter.. Help me please...
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 28, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Why do you feel you need to rederive the equation for resolution in order to solve the problem?
  4. Apr 29, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    This is a case of Airy Diffraction from a circular aperture (a special case of Fraunhofer Diffraction). The angular resolving power is (approx) given by:

    [tex] 1: \ \ \ \ \color{black} \theta_{resolve} \ \approx \ \frac{(1.22)\lambda}{(Aperture \ Diameter)} [/tex]

    The difference between λ in air and that in lens glass must also be accounted for:

    [tex] 2: \ \ \ \ \frac{c}{\color{blue}v_{lens}} \ = \ \frac{\lambda_{air}}{\color{red}\lambda_{lens}} [/tex]

    We are given that:
    {Aperture Diameter} = (1.30 cm) = (1.3e(-2) meters)
    {Wavelength in Air} = λair = (540 nm) = (5.4e(-7) meters)
    {Light Speed in Lens} = vlens = (1.98x10^8 m/s)

    Solving for lens" in Eq #2, we get:
    {Wavelength in Lens} = λlens =
    = (5.4e(-7) meters)*(1.98x10^8 m/s)/(3.0x10^8 m/s) =
    = (3.564e(-7) meters) ::: <---- lens" calculated using Eq #2 with other given values

    With Eq #1 above, calculate θresolve using {λ = λlens} and the other given parameter values.

    Derivation and discussion of Airy Diffraction from a circular aperture (a special case of Fraunhofer Diffraction) can be found here:
    A brief overview discussion can be found here:
    (For this latter ref, follow the indicated links for additional info.)

    Last edited: Apr 29, 2005
  5. Apr 29, 2005 #4
    space tiger, what i mean is how can i derive another formula, coz


    this is the only formula i know for now... since there is speed, how can i apply it to the formula... can u derive me some formula and can u explain it step by step...
  6. Apr 29, 2005 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    When light travels thru a lens, its speed and wavelength change and are different from those in air. (You may want to review Index of Refraction concepts for more info.) Because the angular resolving power "θresolv" depends on "λ", the light's lens" while it travels thru the lens must be used.

    All necessary formulas are provided in Msg #3 of this Thread, including Eq #2 which relates light speed "vlens" (<--- value given in problem) and lens" for light traveling thru the lens. Study the indicated formulas and calculations, and perform the last computation indicated in RED (with Eq #1) using the calculated value for lens" together with the other parameter values listed.

  7. Apr 29, 2005 #6
    ok xanthym, i get it now... all the whole thing.... i can grasp what u mean, but where did the 2nd formula came from in 3rd messsage?? is it a relationship in what?
  8. Apr 29, 2005 #7
    ok, i seem to understand it, but why is my answer incorrect to the book? my answer is 3.344676923x10^-5 whereas in the book, it is 0.00192 degrees?
  9. Apr 29, 2005 #8
    Your answer is correct. Convert it to degrees and you'll find it's the same.
  10. Apr 29, 2005 #9


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

  11. Apr 29, 2005 #10
    u mean to say it is in radians? how can i convert it to degrees? is it divide by 180 or times 180?
  12. Apr 29, 2005 #11
    ok xanthym, i get the whole concept now... thanks for the effort.. i now understand.. =)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Circular aperture