Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Beyond the Standard Models
Claimed derivation of Weinberg angle, Higgs/W mass ratio
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="john baez, post: 6412212, member: 8778"] The Higgs mass also gets renormalized. But there's no point in arguing about these things; someone - and it should be Todorov and his friends - should simply calculate what his theory predicts for the Weinberg angle and Higgs mass at low energies (the energies accessible by experiment). There are standard techniques for doing this, and they're not controversial; it just takes a lot of work. People do this stuff all the time in particle physics. Until this work is done, the theory has not made testable predictions about these numbers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Beyond the Standard Models
Claimed derivation of Weinberg angle, Higgs/W mass ratio
Back
Top