Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Classical Angular Momentum

  1. Jan 1, 2013 #1

    how can I prove this expression classically?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 1, 2013 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Classically, L is not an operator, so you cannot define a commutator.

    You can show that {Li, Lj}=εijkLk. I don't know if that's what you meant by saying "Classically". If so, just write out Li in terms of qi and pi. If you write the correct expression for it using Levi-Civita symbol and apply definition of Poisson bracket, it should be a trivial matter.
  4. Jan 2, 2013 #3
    Yes, exactly. Thank you very much. Using square brackets may be confusing in classical mechanics. I figured out to make this with levi civita symbol. But there is another problem I have now. if I replace the Li with some general vector Vi, it should still be hold


    how should I constract a general V vector?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Classical Angular Momentum
  1. Angular momentum (Replies: 1)

  2. Angular momentum (Replies: 1)

  3. Angular Momentum (Replies: 1)

  4. Angular Momentum (Replies: 1)

  5. Angular momentum (Replies: 1)