Classical mechanics

  • Thread starter Cosmossos
  • Start date
  • #1
100
0

Homework Statement


The problem is number 3d in the following file:
http://phstudy.technion.ac.il/~wn114101/hw/wn2010_hw06.pdf [Broken]



The Attempt at a Solution


I think the difference comes from the using of the momentum p. In the Jaccobi function, we use only coordinate x and its derivatives.
Is it correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
100
0
And also number 4a ii.
How Do I do that?
thank you
 
  • #3
100
0
O.k
I made some progress.
In 4, i need only help with a)ii
thanks
 
  • #4
383
0
The Euler-Lagrange equations of motion are second order differential equations while the canonical equations of motion are first order differential equations. So in the case of the 1D simple harmonic oscillator (with [itex]m=k=1[/itex]),

[tex]
H=\frac{p^2}{2}+\frac{x^2}{2}
[/tex]

the canonical equations come from:

[tex]
\dot{p}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}=-x
[/tex]

[tex]
\dot{x}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}=p
[/tex]

so how can you relate these to the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion:

[tex]
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{x}}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=0
[/tex]

for the same problem?


EDIT: Fixed the E-L eom so that its coordinates match the Hamiltonian & canonical equations of motion.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Classical mechanics

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
779
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top