1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Classical Wave Question

  1. Apr 18, 2010 #1
    If I send a pulse down a string with mass (m1), consider what happens at a point where the mass of the string becomes (m2):

    i) If m1 > m2, the wave is reflected with the same phase as the incident wave.
    ii) If m1 < m2, the wave is reflected 180 degrees out of phase with the incident wave.

    (Let's ignore any transmitted wave)

    Why is this so? Is it an experimental fact, or is there some kind of theoretical/mathematical explanation for this behavior.

    And I can see mathematically why it is the case that if m2 is infinitely larger than m1 (i.e. no transmitted wave - the end of the string is nailed down) the amplitude of the reflected wave is equal to the incident wave, but this seems physically inconsistent to me; if (ii) is true, shouldn't the reflected wave be equal to the "negative" amplitude of the incident wave?

    I appreciate any insight you can give me. Thanks!
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 18, 2010 #2
    Perhaps the Fresnel equations provide the necessary theoretical explanation?
  4. Apr 19, 2010 #3
    I think the incident and reflected wave amplitudes ARE opposite; isn't the result a standing wave on the incident wave side of the barrier?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Classical Wave Question Date
Insights "Classical Physics Is Wrong" Fallacy - Comments Thursday at 10:17 AM
Out of phase EM Wave Dec 29, 2015
Space and Time Invariance (Classical Wave Equation) Apr 15, 2010
Classical Wave Equation Jul 28, 2007
Electromagnetic wave; the classical model Oct 27, 2004